My Canada includes rights of Indigenous Peoples.
LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT!
Peace.

Two Row Wampum Treaty

Two Row Wampum Treaty
"It is said that, each nation shall stay in their own vessels, and travel the river side by side. Further, it is said, that neither nation will try to steer the vessel of the other." This is a treaty among Indigenous Nations, and with Canada. This is the true nature of our relationships with Indigenous Nations of 'Kanata'.

Monday, November 09, 2009

SIX NATIONS ALLIES RALLY IN BRANTFORD

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COZCJH5eaUM&feature=PlayList&p=8ADC4B4279FB461E&index=0

Brantford, Ontario has become ground zero in the struggle over Indigenous rights in Ontario. Most of the city is under land claim, but instead of halting development until the status of the disputed land can be negotiated, Brantford city council is carrying out an aggressive policy of encouraging the criminalization of Six Nations land defenders. Since 2006, when protests in nearby Caledonia erupted, over 60 people from Six Nations have faced more than 160 criminal charges as they have tried to peacefully stop illegal developments from taking place on their lands.

Allies and supporters of Six Nations are standing up and bringing pressure to bear on governments and institutions in order to demand that they respect and honour the treaties and agreements made with Indigenous nations. The Six Nations Solidarity Network — a group made up of non-native activists from communities in and beside the Haldimand tract, an education march on Saturday, Nov 7th 2009, that visited a number of significant locations in Brantford.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

SETTLE LAND CLAIMS FASTER! Chambers of Commerce

Local chamber wants resolution by 2020


The local chamber of commerce was widely supported in B. C. last week in its resolution calling for the faster settlement of native land claims.

Local Chamber of Commerce Brantford Brant president Barry English presented the resolution to more than 300 delegates at the annual general meeting of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce.

Speaking of the uncertainty over First Nations land claims, English said once land claims have been validated, there needs to be a faster process to get to a solution.

"The lengthy delay ... is excessive," English said in his presentation.
And that delay in southern Ontario has stalled economic development and threatened public safety, he said.

There are now 1,410 First Nation land claims in Canada with just 319 settled and 337 concluded. Others are still in negotiation or active litigation and almost 500 of them are under review.

Of the 29 land claims launched by Six Nations against Canada and Ontario in 1995, only four were validated by the federal government before the lawsuit was suspended in 2004. Only one claim has resulted in an offer from the federal government.

The local chamber's proposal calls on the federal government, provinces, territories and First Nations' communities to push the claims through to resolution by 2020.

Claims that are determined to be legitimate ones should be expedited and if an offer of compensation doesn't lead to a settlement within a year, the federal government should take the matter to court, where final compensation could be awarded.

Now that the local proposal has been accepted by the national group, the resolution will be included in the Canadian chamber's advocacy plan.
The Canadian Chamber of Commerce is regarded as the country's largest and most influential business lobby organization.

Copyright © 2009 Brantford Expositor


This is very significant. UNTIL SIX NATIONS STEPPED FORWARD and interfered with development on land under claim, local businesses, Chambers of Commerce and municipal governments have been able to ignore land claims and carry on development as usual. This occurred with the quiet blessing of federal governments, which colluded to sustain local development by stalling and dragging out negotiations for decades, and provincial governments that continued to approve developments on land under claim.

It is no secret that Canada spends more money 'negotiating' and preventing settlement of land claims than it does on paying down these long outstanding debts. Fulfilling the terms of our treaties and other legal obligations to Indigenous Nations is not negotiable: Aboriginal Rights must be respected, according to our own laws.

In the last 3+ years, Six Nations people have stopped several developments in Caledonia and Brantford on land under claim, enduring physical harm (police tasers, batons, 'takedowns', incarceration) and criminal prosecution as a result. Still they persisted, women and youths the driving force, interfering with local economies and with local development plans for land in dispute. This pressure on local economies has finally brought local businesses - the powers that actually run Canada - to speak out via the Brantford and now Canadian Chambers of Commerce.

Chambers of Commerce represent the businesses and industries of Canada, those who employ much of the population and drive the robust economy of Canada, the profits gleaned free of charge from Indigenous land. Federal governments can, and have, placated and ignored the rights of Indigenous Nations, to avoid interfering with local economies and provincial authority. It is only by directly interfering with local economies that Six Nations has caused a disruption of this collusion of all levels of government in evading our laws.

WELL DONE!!

Chambers of Commerce are now lobbying the federal government for action on 'land claims', a powerful lobby indeed. At the same time as they pressure governments, perhaps they will also look to their own localities to ensure that they themselves are doing everything in their power to resolve these issues: IT IS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT THAT INFRINGES on the rights of Indigenous communities, and it is local and provincial business and governments that hold the power, and indeed the duty, to consult with First Nations and to accommodate their rights AT THE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING STAGE.

Sunday, October 11, 2009

SIX NATIONS NEGOTIATIONS

'Deal' really just a framework for more discussion

Gov't: 'Full co-operation' of Six Nations needed

According to a spokesperson for Indian and Northern Affairs, Canada is waiting on Six Nations to complete its responsibilities before flowing funding to the band to help with land negotiations.

At a news conference held Thursday by the Six Nations Confederacy, the group accused Canada of slowing the process of the three-year negotiations by refusing to settle on a facilitator-mediator and not funding the natives at the table for the last six months.

The federal government weighed in on those accusations Friday, saying it's still trying to settle on someone for the important facilitator-mediator job.

"After careful consideration,
a response will be forthcoming," promised Patricia Valladao, the senior communications advisor for the ministry.

Valladao declined to comment on the names of any potential candidates but promised the issue is being discussed.

As far as funding goes, the Confederacy said this week that no one working on the negotiation process has been paid for six months and the group has had to lay off three of its five-member staff.

But Valladao said funding requires "the full co-operation and best efforts of all parties."

She said funds would not be forthcoming until the government gets a First Nations work plan and budget.

"It's the Six Nations' responsibility to complete the work plan and budget before any funding can flow for negotiation purposes."

Canada has already provided negotiation funds to Six Nations through the three-year process.

Almost $2 million in federal money has been paid to the natives for negotiation with an equal amount provided by the Ontario government.

The funds stirred controversy in the native community when people learned of several hefty invoices submitted by those working on the negotiations.

The governments tend to maintain a hands-off attitude, leaving it up to the natives to decided how to spend negotiation funds.

Valladao said the governments are currently in discussion with Six Nations to establish this year's funding.

CORRECTION

A story in Friday's Expositor erroneously reported the Haudenosaunee Development Institute held a news conference Thursday when, in fact, it was the Six Nations Confederacy, of which the HDI is a department, that held the meeting.
Confederacy chief Blake Bomberry also was misidentified in the story. The Expositor regrets the error.


Well, the government caving to appoint a facilitator/mediator is significant.

More ...
http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&ct2=us%2F0_0_s_1_0_t&usg=AFQjCNHZxNtSM5D10XENOjPY0HHsse3m6w&sig2=sF5vqGZhWUwyLsKdHMwerg&cid=0&ei=doHRSui8GJ_oMOKOrIwD&rt=SEARCH&vm=STANDARD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thespec.com%2FNews%2FLocal%2Farticle%2F649880

http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&ct2=us%2F0_0_s_0_0_t&usg=AFQjCNHk6bqdBVmwmPC_dEConCVx27v16g&sig2=5R4pLBzzimL0P5rLSfUQ0Q&cid=1448308232&ei=doHRSui8GJ_oMOKOrIwD&rt=SEARCH&vm=STANDARD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cbc.ca%2Fcanada%2Fstory%2F2009%2F10%2F09%2Fnatives-caledonia-talks009.html

http://cd989.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=17820

Friday, October 09, 2009

Peru Indigenous vs Amazon OIL selloff

grannynote:
It may not be happening here, but the issues are exactly the same for Indigenous Peoples throughout Canada and the world: Governments seek to maximize corporate profits via FREE extraction of natural resources, violating the rights of the Indigenous Peoples on their traditional lands everywhere, and putting lives in jeopardy via conflict and environmental destruction.

If two thirds of the Amazon jungle, the 'lungs' of the world, is to be denuded, made toxic and destroyed, HOW ARE THE REST OF US GOING TO BREATHE?


Peru Indian tribes join forces to fight off Amazon sale to oil companies
October 9, 2009

Achuar elders in Washintsa, Peru.
The Government plans to auction off 75 per cent of the Amazon to [oil] companies

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6867053.ece
Ramita Navai in Washintsa, Peru

They emerged from the thick, green jungle clenching their spears: a long file of barefoot chiefs and elders, their faces painted with their tribal markings and crowns of red, blue and yellow parrot feathers.

They had been summoned by the chief of Washintsa village for a meeting to discuss an oil company’s efforts to buy the rights to their land. Most had travelled for hours, padding silently through the dark undergrowth.

They came from Achuar Indian communities scattered along the Pastaza River, one of the most remote parts of the Peruvian Amazon near the border with Ecuador.

These men are part of a growing resistance movement crystallising deep in the jungles of Peru. For the first time isolated indigenous groups are uniting to fight the Government’s plans to auction off 75 per cent of the Amazon — which accounts for nearly two thirds of the country’s territory — to oil, gas and mining companies.

They oppose 11 decrees issued by President García, under special legislative powers granted to him by the Peruvian Congress, to enact a free trade agreement with the US. These would allow companies to bypass indigenous communities to obtain permits for exploration and extraction of natural resources, logging and the building of hydroelectric dams.

Indigenous leaders say that the laws will affect more than 50 Amazonian nations representing hundreds of thousands of Indians.

One by one the men step forward and deliver angry, defiant messages. “If an oil company tries to come here, we will block its path and block the rivers. We will not let them in and we will take strong action,” Jempe Wasum Kukush, a local leader, said. Another, Tayajin Shuwi Peas, warns: “We are not scared and we will fight to the death over this.”

Some groups have already begun the battle. Protests have turned deadly, with scores of clashes and rallies erupting across the country this year. Oil operations and airports were besieged and shut down, culminating in a mass demonstration of more than 3,000 Indians, mainly from the Awajun tribe, blockading a road in the sweltering jungle town of Bagua in June. More than 30 people were killed, including 20 policemen, after special forces, airlifted to the scene, opened fire on the protesters.

Fearing more violence and faced with public outrage, the Government was forced to revoke two of the most contentious decrees. The Prime Minster resigned and President García also admitted to a series of errors in the handling of the incident.

The Government has also called the protesters extremists and terrorists, and has charged an indigenous leader, who has since fled to Nicaragua, with sedition and rebellion. More than 100 men face criminal charges and many of them live in hiding.

Francisco Shikiu Ukuncham was shot through the back and saw three of his friends killed. He says that the fighting has served to strengthen ties between tribes. “All we want is for our home, the jungle, to be respected. We were demonstrating peacefully and they shot at us like we were dogs,” he said. “But the Government doesn’t listen to us. And if it doesn’t listen, the situation is going to get worse.”

Some of the tribes communicate with each other via a web of radios. The network has enabled disparate indigenous groups — often located hundreds of miles apart — to form alliances, co-ordinate protests and exchange information.

According to Ambrosio Uwak, the president of an indigenous rights organisation and one of the leaders of the movement, his group can mobilise more than 15,000 people through the radio system. “We want every single one of these decrees revoked. But if not, we won’t hesitate to call on our people to rise up again,” he said.

Unreported World, Peru: Blood and Oil. Friday, October 9. 7.30pm. Channel 4
CANADA STALLING on mediation: Six Nations

Natives accuse Ottawa of foot dragging
Won't agree to land-claims mediation: Six Nations

http://www.thespec.com/News/CanadaWorld/article/650491
October 09, 2009
Daniel Nolan
CALEDONIA - The Six Nations Confederacy is accusing Canada of stopping progress in talks to settle land claims because it won’t agree to mediation.

The Confederacy, appointed by the elected-band council in 2006 to conduct negotiations with Ottawa and Ontario, also says commitments by Canada to help fund Six Nations in order to create an “equal bargaining field” has not been forthcoming and it has had to lay off staff and rely on “the goodwill of our people to attempt to maintain a presence at the negotiation table.”

The statements were made by Confederacy representatives today at the conclusion of the latest round of land claim talks, which first began in May 2006 to try to resolve a dispute over the occupation by natives of a Caledonia housing project. It blossomed into other land claims, and saw Ottawa make two offers - $125 million and $26 million - to resolve different claims, but no agreements have been reached.

In the meantime, natives have halted development projects in Brantford and Hagersville because they say they’re being built on unsurrendered Six Nations land.

Ontario supports the idea of bringing in a mediator, but Confederacy spokesman Aaron Detlor said Canada has consistently blocked it. Names of judges have been proposed with no response, he said, and lately the name of Dr. Peggy Blair has been suggested. She is a leading lawyer in aboriginal affairs and completed negotiation skills training at Harvard Law in 1993.

“We need the assistance of a mediator-facilitator,” he said. “We have a fundamental disagreement about one party showing up at negotiations and saying ‘Here is the agreement. Take it or leave it.’ That’s not negotiating. They show up and say, ‘Here’s how we’re going to negotiate a settlement. You’re going to take what we’re going to offer and not ask any questions about it.”

Federal officials left before reporters could speak to them and could not be reached for comment later. A spokesperson for federal Indian Affairs Minister Chuck Strahl could not be reached for comment.

On the issue of financing, Detlor said the Six Nations team has been without any funding for the last six months. He said it has had to let go three people, such as a researcher, and plans to cut two more. They have suggested $1.2 million is adequate to help them with the ongoing negotiations.

“It diminishes (our ability to negotiate) significantly,” Detlor said about the cash shortage. “Ontario has seven or eight people and the feds have seven or eight people. We don’t have the same back office support they have of hundreds of people. We have five people.”

“It’s simply not fair to ask people to put their lives on hold in good-faith negotiations without any ability to feed their families.”

Detlor said talks have not broken off and the three sides are set to meet again next month.

“We’re committed to continuing talks and we’re hoping the federal Crown will see the light of day,” he added.

He wouldn’t say frustration by land claims supporters will lead to more demonstrations, but noted: “Significant business interest in this part of Ontario is on hold until we get a mediator-facilitator. People are not going to come here and invest in this area if we cannot get a simple agreement on a mediator-facilitator.”

'We keep getting blocked'
http://www.brantfordexpositor.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2096313

The Haudenosaunee Development Institute went public with its complaints against the province and the federal government on Thursday, accusing them of delaying negotiations over land claims.

In a hastily arranged news conference after the latest table talk among the institute, Canada and Ontario, three HDI spokesmen announced the governments are balking at all their suggestions for a mediator-facilitator who could help move the process along and are refusing to assist with funding for natives who are engaged in the process.

"We have been working at getting a mediator-facilitator for four months," said spokesman Aaron Detlor, who is also a lawyer. "We keep getting blocked time and time again."

Detlor said the HDI has suggested various names, including Canadian judges, and has been open to input from the governments about who could be brought in to offer impartial advice on moving forward.

The terms of reference for a mediator-facilitator have already been agreed upon, so it's just a matter of selecting a person.

"We've tried to make a process where everyone can be satisfied and we get forced back by a federal crown with a message that's basically 'Our way or the highway'"
Additionally, no one working on the negotiation process has been paid for the last six months and Detlor said the HDI has had to lay off three of its five-member administrative staff , including a researcher, assistant and co-ordinator.

"It diminishes us."

Detlor said each of the governments shows up at the talks with seven or eight highly paid negotiators.

The lawyer also said the HDI is not halting the talks, but is hopeful people will demand their politicians push for more movement.

HDI's Mike Bomberry read a prepared statement saying the natives have lost good faith in the negotiation because of the approach Canada and Ontario have chosen to take, creating an "unfair bargaining field."

With no administrative funding support from Canada, the natives have relied on volunteer assistance at the negotiation table and have had to lay off staff .

"(We) may now be forced to shut down offices at the Oneida Business Park since it cannot aff ord the rent," said Bomberry.

Aboriginal Affairs Minister Brad Duguid, reached at the legislature in Toronto, said his instructions to negotiators have been to be as flexible as possible.

"We're enthusiastic supporters of bringing in a facilitator to try and trigger more progress in the talks," Duguid said.

"We continue to support the Haudenosaunee/Six Nations people and urge the federal government to show as much flexibility as possible to reach a consensus on who that should be."

The minister said he hasn't seen the names suggested as a facilitator, but he sees no reason why a suitable candidate can't be swiftly found.

Representatives from the federal and provincial government did not remain at the Oneida Business Park after talks today to offer comment.

In related negotiations, Brantford was back in court last week regarding its injunction against native protesters and was rewarded with a clarification from Justice Harrison Arrell that says the native protesters are prohibited from stopping work at the 10 development sites named in the original injunction.

The clarification seems aimed at the protests of Floyd and Ruby Montour who recently stopped work on Erie Avenue, along with a handful of supporters.

Meanwhile, Brantford police are investigating comments made on an Internet discussion board about the protesters.

One poster suggested the native protest could be stopped through a violent act and the Montours were asked to discuss their safety with police.

Copyright © 2009 Brantford Expositor
EDWARDS LANDFILL, Cayuga -

Another Site 41?

UPDATE ACTION ALERT
October 7, 2009

Hey folks,

Just to let you know that one dumptruck has made it past the lines at
Edwards, and more are expected to be on their way. There are about 15
non-native supporters at the site, but more folks are needed. For
details about how to get there you can send a text to Niki at 905 921
2893 or Katie at 416 653 2580. From what I just heard from Katie, the
police are threatening arrests if anyone blocks the trucks.

At the same time as all of this is happening, there are Six Nations folks at
the Erie Ave site trying to stop construction there as well...

mailing list six_nations_info@masses.tao.ca


Landfill in southern Ontario starts legal battle

October 6, 2009
by Geordie Gwalgen Dent

The Dominion -


2008 blockade at Edwards site. Photo: Jim Windle

TORONTO—After years of blockades and campaigning, another battle to protect wetlands and water in southern Ontario is going to court.

Cayuga is a small community on Six Nations territory south of Hamilton. For five years, protesters, First Nations and Cayuga residents have been trying to stop the development of a landfill by SF Partnership Chartered Accountants and Haldimand Norfolk Sanitary Landfill Inc. On October 2, preliminary hearings to stop the site's development occurred.

“There have been blockades to stop trucks coming in twice,” most recently in late 2008, says Jody Orr, co-chair of Haldimand Against Landfill Transfer (HALT). “What happened in 2007 was an attempt to bring garbage in and some members of the Haudenosaunee and our group stopped it. Since then, there has been little activity on the site. We keep a watch on it.”

Blockades and legal battles around dump sites and development have been numerous this summer in Southern Ontario. Site 41 in Simcoe County was slated to have a dump site built on top of it for garbage from the surrounding area. Unfortunately for residents in the area, it would also be on an aquifer containing the “purest water in the world.” Protesters and members of the Council Of Canadians filed an injunction claiming the site was operating illegally in July of 2009 and on September 22 Simcoe County councilors voted to stop construction and development of the site.

Just a few weeks earlier, development at the Hanlon Creek Business Park (HCBP) in Guelph was halted for 30 days by a court injunction. The site had been occupied beginning in July by Guelph and Six Nations protesters. Recently, the City of Guelph voted to halt construction until July 2010.

Both situations mirror developments at the Edwards landfill site in Cayuga.

The Edwards site is within the Haldimand Tract, land granted to Six Nations in 1784. The site was opened in 1959 as an industrial and commercial landfill and has maintained sporadic activity as a dump site since.

Serious contamination of the site occurred between the late 1960s and late 1980s when the St. Lawrence Resin Products Plant was dumping industrial waste there. Thousands of tons of toxic chemicals have been found in the site including toluene, ethylstyrene, xylene, ehtylbenzene, ethyltoluene, methylstyrene, cymene and divinyl benzene.

When the site was opened again as a landfill in 2004, HALT was formed by Cayuga residents hoping to stop continued contamination from the use of the site. “We had tried different steps and had gone through a legal process, and despite that the trucks were still coming in,” says Ann Vallentin, another co-chair of HALT.

In 2007 blockades against trucks associated with Haldimand Norfolk Sanitary Landfill Inc, the company owning the site, began.

“We didn't see another route to go at that point, says Vallentin. “We were not exited but it was a last-resort effort at that point. The blockade was done by Six Nations members and activists at the road at the time.” Eventually an injunction was put against anyone trying to stop the trucks.

The blockades were successful, at least temporarily. The company, having spent a considerable amount of money on site preparation, was unable to deliver garbage. Shortly before, it had gone into bankruptcy and was put into receivership. Receiver Brahm Rosen, of SF Partnership Chartered Accountants in Toronto, has been trying to “operate the landfill and sell it as is our mandate...as receiver.”

“But we can't do it," said Rosen, speaking in the Hamilton Spectator. Rosen was unable to contact this author by deadline.

Similar to Site 41 and HCBP, a collaboration between First Nations and white activists has been key to the success of stopping the Edwards site from further use.

According to Orr, “In HALT, there are people that do not agree with what is happening with a number of issues (such as land claims). Some will be supportive, but not others. On this issue, everyone sees a reason to come together. I don't want to leave my grandkids this kind of legacy. I think that the involvement of the Haudenosaunee was critical in stopping garbage. If it had not been for their decision, I'm not sure what the outcome would have been.”

In 2007, Six Nations spokesperson Ruby Montour said the Haudenosaunee Development Institute had not been informed about revival of the dumpsite and told the Hamilton Spectator: "This is Haudenosaunee land and it's not for garbage. Why should the people who live around there have to fear that?"

The Hoskanigetah of the Grand River, a group within the Haudenosaunee, have made repeated announcements that they will not allow the “reactivation of the Edwards Landfill” promising to “undertake the supervision of our own Environmental Review of contamination.”

Wilf Ruland, a professional geoscientist, says serious contamination at the site exists. Conducting a “Review of 2006 Monitoring Report for Edwards Landfill,” Ruland found that “the existing hazardous wastes on the Edwards Landfill property pose an ongoing threat to both groundwater and surface water quality for as long as they remain on the property.“

The Hoskanigetah have outlined concerns regarding premature births, miscarriages and deformities, pointing out that “the integrity of the same liner used at Edwards Landfill has been breached at other sites including [in] the US, where it has been used.”

In an email, Jennifer Hall, Regional Communications Advisor for the Ministry of the Environment, stated that “the newly constructed landfill cell meets the stringent requirements of Ontario’s landfill design standards.”

HALT disagrees and is now taking the receiver to court, seeking an injunction to stop the development of the site.

“When the receiver got an injunction against the protesters, the CoA [certificate of approval] from the Ministry of Environment had a number of provisions that had been violated,” says Orr. HALT then filed a counter-injunction which stopped work on the site and mandated that protesters would be notified of subsequent work.

“In 2008, a number of conditions still had not been met. The Ministry of Environment was allowing things to go ahead without proper approval. There’s a lack of detail on the decontaminating plan for a very toxic site.”

Like the Hoskanigetah, Orr and HALT have concerns about the integrity of the liner and charge that there is no monitoring of the quality of water and no annual report on environmental plans, as mandated by the certificate of approval. “We’re seeking in court, for prosecution, that this site is operating illegally,” says Orr.

According to Hall, “There were some minor items of non-compliance regarding preparation of the site to receive waste that have since been resolved. The ministry is satisfied that the receiver is in compliance with their CoA and the court order.

“The CoA requires the site owner to monitor ground and surface water on the site for impacts caused by the landfill site. The ministry is confident that the terms and conditions of the CoA will protect groundwater and surface water.“

Though the legal process to stop the site is in its early stages, neither Orr nor Vallentin are optimistic that the site will be permanently closed any time soon.

“Will [the legal work] be effective? I don't know,” says Vallentin. “We were told by people when we started that it was going to happen so there was no reason to try to stop it. But we felt that if it was bad then we have a duty to try to do what we can do. Typically in situations like this companies will keep trying until they wear out people on the ground. Site 41 took 25 years, I hope it wont be the same thing here.”
_____
Geordie Gwalgen Dent is a contributing member of the Toronto Media Co-op.

A version of this article was originally published by the Toronto Media Co-op.
----------------------------

Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:40 PM
...........

From: Niki Thorne

Hi friends and allies,

We've gotten word that garbage will be brought to the Edwards Landfill
site in Cayuga on Wednesday. Letters from the Hoskanigetah, the
Confederacy Council and Band Council will be presented to the OPP
today in an attempt to diffuse the situation, however, there is every
likelihood that the Hoskanigetah will have to take direct action to
prevent the reopening of Edwards on Wednesday (tomorrow).

There is evidence of toxic waste having been illegally dumped at
Edwards (as well as other sites around the region) from the now
defunct Saint Lawrence resin plant. Additionally, Edwards is located
in an environmentally sensitive wetlands area. Not only is it
damaging to the land, there have been some very alarming indications
for human health.

Allies are invited to participate in this action, under the leadership
of the Hoskanigetah. It is of utmost importance to respect the
Hoskanigetah's leadership in this action to reduce the likelihood of
arrests or police violence, and in terms of media strategy for public
opinion.

Contact Wes Elliot by text for specifics on the action (519 757 5427).
Allies are especially encouraged to organize among themselves to come
down with cars and video equipment.
In Solidarity,
--------------
~~Niki, for CUPE 3903's First Nations Solidarity Working Group
For more information about Edwards:
http://6nsolidarity.wordpress.com/2009/09/27/concerns-over-possible-reopening-of-toxic-edwards-landfill/
http://6nsolidarity.wordpress.com/2009/07/21/a-message-from-the-hoskanigetah-mens-fire-of-six-nations/
_______________________________________________
six_nations_info mailing list
six_nations_info@masses.tao.ca

Thursday, October 08, 2009

/
/
imagineNATIVE: SIX MILES DEEP



The remarkable evolution of Indigenous cinema will be celebrated at the 10th imagineNATIVE Film + Media Arts Festival, which runs in Toronto from Oct. 14 until Oct. 18.
The annual festival which showcases global aboriginal filmmakers and media artists this year features more than 125 works of Indigenous innovation in film, video, radio and new media.
Many of imagineNATIVE's premieres went on to win awards at festivals, such as Sundance and Berlin, and have even garnered Oscar nominations.
The celebration of imagineNATIVE's 10th anniversary offers an important occasion to reflect on the accomplishments of the last 10 years and the exciting opportunities ahead of us, says executive director Kerry Swanson. The films programmed this year, adds director of programming Michelle Latimer, speak to the contemporary experience and reflect the fact that today's Indigenous filmmakers are reclaiming the medium of film and transforming the world-view of Indigenous people by voicing our contemporary stories from the inside out.
...
In a world premiere, emerging filmmaker/writer/activist

Sarah Roque's SIX MILES DEEP offers an

uncompromising look at the brave women who stood

behind the lines during the 2006

Caledonia/Six Nations
land claim dispute.

This intimate portrayal celebrates clan mothers

from past to present, while giving voice to the hopes

and dreams of an entire community.

_______________________________________________

Related News:

SIX NATIONS TO UPDATE LAND TALKS
More than three years since Caledonia occupation

October 08, 2009
Meredith MacLeod

Six Nations traditional chiefs will give an update today on the state of the land rights negotiations going on with the federal and provincial governments.

The Haudenosaunee Chiefs will speak to the media at 2 p.m. at the Oneida Business Park in Six Nations.

The parties have been at the table since 2006, when the occupation of a Caledonia subdivision under construction sparked a standoff.

Now, a number of developments in the disputed Haldimand Tract, a 10-kilometre ribbon on either side of the Grand River, have been put on hold.

Friday, October 02, 2009

UN Indigenous Human Rights
UN Indigenous Human Rights, Sept 30, 2009 HRC Discusses rights of Indigenous peoples and HR Bodies and Mechanisms http://censored-news.blogspot.com/2009/09/un-indigenous-human-rights-sept-30-2009.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- First Peoples Human Rights Coalition Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:08 AM Reply-To: info@firstpeoplesrights.org To: info@firstpeoplesrights.org From the UN Press Release below: KENNETH DEER, of Indigenous World Association, said that they were dismayed that indigenous representatives who had travelled here over the weekend had not been able to get on the list of the interactive dialogue with the Special Rapporteur because non-governmental organizations with a permanent presence had taken much of the speaking time available. Whenever possible, indigenous delegates had to be given the opportunity to represent themselves. ... MANON BOISCLAIR (Canada) said that Canada would like to reiterate its support for the important role of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous people. Canada further noted with appreciation Mr. Anaya's resolve to focus his work on the core issues in specific countries and specific situations of allegations of human rights violations. The Special Rapporteur also rightfully highlighted the importance of the coordination with the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues and the Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and asked whether the Special Rapporteur continued to pursue his efforts in this area? Canada indicated that it would be interested to know if the Special Rapporteur also envisioned coordination with other bodies which dealt with individual complaints. Canada appreciated the Special Rapporteur's efforts to take a balanced approach on the delicate issue of the duty of States to consult with indigenous peoples on matters affecting their particular interests, and would be grateful for any views or guidance the Special Rapporteur may have to offer for situations where, despite efforts, consultations had reached an impasse.
(ie, where Indigenous communities in Canada have protested and blockaded and said "NO!" to planned developments like a uranium mine, sprawl development, etc) Phht!! Maybe CorporationCanada just needs to stop destroying the earth and its peoples for profit! There is no business to be done on a dead planet -David Brower
Dump opponents insist battle not over yet Author: Nicole Million Date: Sep 29, 2009 Steve Ogden fought for more than 20 years against the County of Simcoe’s proposed landfill at Site 41 in Tiny Township. Though council has voted to abandon the plan, Ogden said he won’t be celebrating until the certificate of approval allowing a dump on the site is revoked by the province. Opponents of landfill Site 41 may have breathed a small sigh of relief, but they’re refusing to let their guard down just yet. Longtime dump critic Steve Ogden said news of the 25-3 vote on Sept. 22 to abandon plans for the controversial dump is definitely good news, but he won’t celebrate until Simcoe County council votes to revoke the certificate of approval (C of A) issued by the province. “I don’t believe it’s over and done with,” Ogden said, adding he’s concerned county council may come back in a different configuration after the fall 2010 municipal election and vote to revive the landfill. “The C of A is still alive and well for that site, which means there could still be a dump in the future. Until such time that it’s revoked, I think we should be quite afraid.” Ogden said he was confident leading up to the meeting that council would dump the dump for good, but he wasn’t surprised when they opted not to revoke the C of A. “There’s more going on here than meets the eye,” he said. Among Ogden’s concerns is the possibility the county will sell the property to a private company that will go ahead and build a landfill. “If we put our guard down, we’re going to see something happen. I think we should be very cautious.” Anne Ritchie-Nahuis echoed Ogden’s disappointment that council chose not to seek removal of the C of A. “It’s with very cautious optimism that we move forward,” she said. “We know we need to remove the C of A, and we feel (that) is the only adequate means of stopping Site 41.” Vicki Monague, a Christian Island resident and a leader of the Anishinabe Kweag protest, was less circumspect, telling The Mirror she was ecstatic with the vote. “It was something that our group had been working towards ever since we started the protest camp. A lot of us feel that our objectives … have been met now,” she said. “We’re really happy and thankful county council passed that resolution.” Both Ogden and Ritchie-Nahuis credited the overwhelming public pressure – including the First Nations camp near the site, daily protests and the support of big names like former U.S. presidential candidate Ralph Nader, environmentalist David Suzuki and Council of Canadian chairperson Maude Barlow – as the driving force behind putting a stop to the more than 20-year fight to stop the landfill. “The fact that people mobilized and stood up, I think there was quite a great fear amongst the elected officials that they must do something or they would never be re-elected or be seen as credible,” said Ogden. The concerns have always been there, added Ritchie-Nahuis, but the strong, science-based opposition to the site was bolstered this time by widespread public support. “There’s always been strong opposition, (but) the protesters brought it to a new level and First Nations people have made a great commitment to protecting Mother Earth,” she said. “People all over the world do not appreciate wasteful use of water resources. We have a strong commitment to move forward and ensure our community’s water supply is protected.” Penetanguishene Mayor Anita Dubeau, who initially voted to support the controversial landfill before changing her mind, said she is confident the landfill plan will not be revived. “I believe Site 41 is dead, which I believe is a good thing,” she said. “Now it’s very prudent of the 32 members that sit on county council to consider options and where we go from here. North Simcoe’s garbage has been filling up other people’s landfills, and we appreciate the fact we’re allowed to do that, but we do have to look at solutions.” Dubeau said she hopes those who were against the development of Site 41 will come forward with new ideas, but noted she believes withdrawing the C of A at this time is premature. “Do I think that county council is ever going to sell that property and let a private developer put in a landfill? I would say that would be an absolute silly move on our part after what’s gone on,” she said. “Maybe there’s something else we can do with that property that’s not landfill, but may be related to waste management.” Ray Millar, former chair of the community monitoring committee tasked with advising the landfill plan and representing citizens’ interests to the county, told The Mirror it was inevitable the landfill would never come to fruition. He said he was “very pleased” with the decision overall, but surprised with the numbers. “I expected there to be more (votes against) the plan to discontinue it permanently,” he said. “The big challenge lies just ahead of us now, and that’s moving Simcoe County to a zero-waste approach. Rather than constantly looking for ways to manage our waste, it’s time we moved our efforts to reducing waste and eliminating it from our lexicon.” Site 41 Chronology 1979: North Simcoe municipalities begin the search for a new landfill site. 1986: A 20.7-hectare (50-acre) parcel in Tiny Township is selected as the preferred site, based on 20 technical criteria. It is Site 41. 1989: Ministry of the Environment concurs with the local environmental assessment process that recommends Site 41. 1990: Provincial cabinet intervenes on site selection process. 1990: Issue referred to a joint board – a combination of the Ontario Municipal Board and the Environmental Review Tribunal. Board notes guidelines have changed and recommends further review. 1990-93: Additional sites are reviewed, but Site 41 remains the preferred choice. May 1993: Joint Board hearing resumes, and lasts until November 1994. 1995: The Joint Board grants approval for the landfill site. 1995: The North Simcoe Waste Management Association disbands; Simcoe County takes over the development process. 1998: Ministry of the Environment issues a provisional certificate of approval; county begins to buy land. 1998-2003: Technical studies conducted as stipulated by the provisional C of A. 2003: Tiny Township and the community monitoring committee hire independent engineering and environmental consultants to review the county’s work. Oct. 20, 2006: Ministry of the Environment issues final approval for Site 41 landfill. June 26, 2007: County council approves initial site development. Dec. 8, 2008: Ministry of the Environment issues permit to take water, allowing construction to start. 2009: Cell construction begins. Aug. 25, 2009: County council votes in favour of a one-year moratorium. Sept. 22, 2009: Council votes 25-3 to abandon its plans for the dump.

Thursday, October 01, 2009

Kapyong transfer invalid, court rules First Nations see decision as a victory in fight for urban reserve Last Updated: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 CBC News http://www.cbc.ca/canada/manitoba/story/2009/09/30/300909-kapyong-decision-invalid.html The Kapyong Barracks were built on a 90-hectare parcel of land that is now nestled between Tuxedo and River Heights, two affluent Winnipeg neighbourhoods.The Kapyong Barracks were built on a 90-hectare parcel of land that is now nestled between Tuxedo and River Heights, two affluent Winnipeg neighbourhoods. The transfer of a former military base in suburban Winnipeg to a Crown corporation for redevelopment and sale has been declared invalid, a Federal Court judge ruled Wednesday. The 90-hectare parcel of land along Kenaston Boulevard, known as Kapyong Barracks, has been vacant since 2004 when the 2nd Battalion, Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry, relocated to CFB Shilo near Brandon, Man. In a ruling made public Wednesday, Justice Douglas Campbell said the federal government didn't do enough consultation with First Nations groups over the future use of the land before transferring it to the Canada Lands Corp., which would redevelop and sell the land. In his ruling, Campbell called Kapyong "prime land for commercial development." The land in question is the site of the former barracks — south of Grant Avenue, west of Kenaston Boulevard, and north of Wilkes Avenue. It does not include the swath of homes in the area that used to be residences for soldiers and their families. Lawyers for the government argued they had no duty to consult with the First Nations groups when decisions about the future of Kapyong were made. The court disagreed.
Federal court Justice Douglas Campbell's order: "Canada acted contrary to law by failing to meet the mandatory legal requirement of consultation with the Brokenhead and Peguis First Nations before the making of the November 2007 decision to transfer the surplus lands at Kapyong Barracks to the Canada Lands Company pursuant to the Treasury Board Directive on the Sale or Transfer of Surplus Real Property; and, as a result, the November 2007 decision is invalid."
"While the record discloses that some dialogue took place about the disposition of the Kapyong Barracks ... it also establishes that from the beginning to the end of the decision making with respect to the lands, it is clear that Canada had no intention to grant any meaningful consultation," Campbell said. Major win for First Nations: lawyer The decision marks a legal victory for a group of Manitoba First Nations communities that have been embroiled in a legal battle over the land. Seven First Nations groups had argued the federal government should have used the property to settle outstanding land claims. They want the land to develop housing and native-owned enterprises. Norman Boudreau, lawyer for the communities, said the ruling paves the way for the potential acquisition of some or all of the Kapyong land. "What this says that Canada has to sit down with the First Nations, and consult with the First Nations as to what is it that they want to do with the property," Boudreau said. Chief Glenn Hudson of the Peguis First Nation, one of seven bands that took the federal government to court, said the ruling proves First Nations land treaties are living documents the Crown must fulfill. He also said that having land within Winnipeg is a tremendous opportunity for First Nations. "We look at the business development side but also there's the residential component. We're going to explore all options and certainly, we want to do not only what's in our First Nations interest but also in the interest of the society around us," Hudson said. Boudreau said the First Nations would be meeting internally to discuss their legal victory and then would likely instruct their lawyers to meet with federal lawyers to work out a plan for future steps. Wednesday's court order also orders the government to pay the aboriginal groups' legal costs. Officials with the federal Department of National Defence said they are studying the court ruling and its implications before making any comment.

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Forced vaccinations?
thahoketoteh@hotmail.com This video is by a soldier in the US who just came back from a swine flu drill. She gives her warning and dates that they WILL do this to all of us. Please do your own due diligence on this document she shows at the end. We can see what the Endgame is for these people controlling the financial markets. They want to kill most of us and have the rest of us "enjoy their servitude" The apocalypse is now and we can finally see what has been going on behind the curtain.

OK so it seems a bit over the top, but if it turns out to be true, you heard it here.

My vaccination story: I got a flu vaccine one year ... got pneumonia and was sick for 6 months before I figured out something was wrong with my body not my head. Never got one since and won't.The doctor said at the time that if you get your vaccine later in the season as I did, the virus may have already mutated to 'next year's flu' and you may be more susceptible to it.

That's exactly what they are saying now about H1N1(swine flu): If you got last year's flu vaccine then you are more susceptible to H1N1 this year. The flu viruses get more severe every year.

WHY WOULD ANYONE EVER GET A VACCINE ANY YEAR THAT'S GOING TO MAKE THEM MORE SUSCEPTIBLE TO A MORE VIRULENT DISEASE THE NEXT YEAR?
No thanks. I'll take my chances with the flu.

Oh ...did you hear? The H1N1 vaccine isn't ready and will be late ... already well into flu season. All the people who got last year's vaccine are now getting sick with swine flu. What you want to bet that by the time the vaccine is ready, the virus will be mutated to next year's strain? In other words, the (late) swine flu vaccine will not protect you from anything and in fact will make it more certain that lots of people will get very sick this year.

I think it's a racket propogated for profit by big pharma, and maybe by megalomaniacs ... who the heck knows.

I haven't packed my survival kit yet though.

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Why is Six Nations funding Canadian taxpayers? Well summer's almost over, school has started again, and the Brantford Expositor is still publishing Gary Horsnell's dumb questions that he could find answers to if he tried. Of course, finding answers is not what Horsnell's about as he's a truth twister ... as friend satori says ... "trying to intellectualize bigotry". Here are Horsnell's questions, and some answers ...
Brantford Expositor Why are taxpayers funding Six Nations? In a recent Expositor article, Bill Montour, the chief of the Six Nations of the Grand River elected band council, said the Six Nations spent about $70 million to run the reserve, which has about 17,000 people. That works out to about $4,117.64 per person. The article also said that Brant County's budget was $110 million for 35,000 people. That works out to $3,142.85 per person. The City of Brantford, on its website, shows the 2009 net municipal budget is $110.3 million for a population of about 90,000 people. That works out to about $1,226 per person. How come the Six Nations spends so much more per person per year to run the reserve than Brant council to run the county or Brantford council to run the city?
Apples and oranges: Municipal budgets and Six Nations' budgets are not directly comparable. Six Nations budget includes funding for all services, whether federally, provincially or locally funded. Municipal budgets, for example, do not include EDUCATION and HEALTH CARE, major services funded directly by the province, while Six Nations' provides those services and others out of its budget. In Ontario, $42.6b (43%) of the provincial budget goes to Health Care and $14.2 billion (14%) to Education. On that basis alone, one would expect that Six Nations budget, per capita, would be at least more than twice that of a municipality. The correct comparison would be municipal + provincial + federal funding per capita in Brant County and Brantford compared to Six Nations budget per capita. I'll leave Mr. Horsnell to do the math on that, and at the same time figure out why Brant County's funding per capita is so much higher than Six Nations and Brantford!
Much of the money the Six Nations spends to run the reserve flows from taxpayers outside of the reserve through Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) to the reserve. But why does the Crown use money from taxpayers to fund the Six Nations? The Crown bought the land along the Grand River from the Mississauga Indians on May 22, 1784. Later, on Oct. 25, 1784, Governor Haldimand issued a proclamation, which allowed Mohawk leader Joseph Brant and his Six Nations followers to settle on and use the Crown land along the Grand River. Then, in 1793, Governor Simcoe issued his letter patent to the Six Nations for land along the Grand River. But the Haldimand Proclamation and the Simcoe Patent do not mention anything about the Crown funding the Six Nations. The people of the Six Nations of the Grand River were expected to sustain and support themselves on the land they were allowed to occupy along the Grand River. Nevertheless, INAC and other government agencies have been sending money from taxpayers to the Six Nations of the Grand River for decades. INAC funds infrastructure and programs on the reserve and Canadian government agencies have provided money for water treatment, a dialysis clinic, other structures and programs and recently $1.99 million for the Kayanase ECO Centre. So, why do INAC and other Canadian government agencies send money from taxpayers to the Six Nations of the Grand River to fund infrastructure and programs on the reserve, when the Six Nations was expected to sustain itself and there is no treaty or agreement I can find which calls for the Crown to use money from taxpayers to fund the reserve? Garry Horsnell Brantford Article ID# 1736187
Mr. Horsnell, not surprisingly for a truth twister, makes no mention of the fact that the Crown somehow subsequently 'assumed' for itself about 95% of the Haldimand Tract excluding only the current Six Nations reserve lands. Proceeds from the settlement of that land, leases or sales, were to be deposited in Six Nations trust fund maintained by the federal government, for them to draw on for the needs of their community. Somehow, the federal government cannot, or refuses to, account for the Six Nations trust fund. That is why Six Nations is currently pursuing 29 legal claims against the federal government. It is known that Six Nations trust fund was embezzled by the Crown to build Osgoode Hall, the Welland Canal, and other infrastructure. It is also known that while Six Nations Band Council received $46m in federal and provincial funding this year, Six Nations people and businesses paid well over $140m to Canada/Ontario in taxes! It is thus more accurate to ask: WHY IS SIX NATIONS FUNDING CANADIAN TAXPAYERS?

Monday, April 27, 2009

MNN Been there! Done that! Mohawk Nation News BEEN THERE! DONE THAT! MNN. April 25, 2009. The Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA has established facilities that look very much like concentration camps across the U.S. [YouTube: FEMA Concentration Camps in USA]. In Georgia half a million plastic coffins were discovered in a fenced area near an airport. [www.infowars.com]. We speculate that similar camps are being set up in other parts of the world. They are being called “shelters”. This could be part of an old tactic that was used to wipe out over 100 million Indigenous people of the Western Hemisphere. Our People were murdered, diseased, our food was destroyed and we had no place to live. After 99% of us died off, forts, missions and then reservations were set up to house the survivors. Up to recent times we could not leave our lockups without a pass. We were supposed to become subservient and to accept whatever was meted out to us. Our children were taken from us and put into residential and boarding schools to be “educated”. Many were corrupted by perverts and pedophiles or disappeared. The goal was to break our tie with the natural world, each other and our love for humanity. These are the forces that are necessary to create true democracy. The corporatist war lords today want to own the globe and control everything on it without resistance from anyone. Because Indigenous put nature first, someone decided that we had to be sacrificed. Most of us are forced to live in conditions of extreme poverty which is ignored by the world. Remember that lockup in the New Orleans arena during Hurricane Katrina? Troops, cops and Blackwater confiscated legal weapons of the victims and shot people. Many were robbed and attacked. Some died due to lack of oxygen, sanitation and chaos. Roads were blocked. They could not escape. Presently droughts, unemployment, homelessness and a destroyed middle class could be slated for these centers. Before martial law is declared dissenters will be rounded up first. Afterwards the rest will be brought in and divided up into laborers and slaves. Those not useful will be “pushed aside”. Today we are afraid of these shelters. Internet survival sites warn us to avoid them. A small close knit group of about 1 per cent of the population plans to put in place and run a totalitarian dictatorship over the rest of us. Their enforcers are trained to kill or maim people without batting an eyelash. For the last 50 years this secret clique has been stealthily infiltrating institutions and agencies such as the government, police, military, commerce, medical, media and now the internet. The sickening compliant United Nations will oversee global military power. These days hired mercenaries outnumber the soldiers, such as in Iraq and Afghanistan. Wars are being privatized using high tech well-equipped hired guns to do most of the fighting. The International Monetary Fund and World Bank will control the global markets and currencies. Soon they may conjure up a reason to declare martial law. Incarcerations and killings will be at the discretion of the corporatist war lords. How about these new sicknesses that combine bird, pig and human viruses? The researchers who might have combined them say they are baffled. There are suspicions that this could be a targeted bacteria. Will the cures be available to everyone or only to the rich or citizens of certain states? Or are the “antidotes” meant to kill certain others? Is it meant to contain our movements? The old biological warfare tactic has been brought out of the time capsule. Neglecting the poor is a sign of corporate fascism. “Why should I share?” yell U.S. citizens. This is becoming an accepted form of conduct. Self-centered and dishonest people want to eliminate those they decide are the refuse of society. Henry Kissinger, an advisor to President Obama, calls them “useless eaters”. [www.population-security.org]. Henry, your ancestors were almost wiped out by a man [Adolph Hitler] who was preaching exactly what you are saying. Remember, those who seek power think they can work with these kinds of war mongers and remain safe. In the end, these fascists have been known to turn on their stooges and push them into the very cells and ovens they created together. We Indigenous have the trump card! The Rotino’shonni:onwe, Iroquois Confederacy, developed the Kaianereh’ko:wa, the Great Law of Peace, a true democracy, on Onowaregeh, Great Turtle Island. It was based on real equality, sharing and everyone having a voice. The whole world must equally benefit from the fruits of the earth. Atotarho, the chairman of the Iroquois Confederacy, has no power. The power is in the people. The leaders must listen to the people. Equality is between the strong and the small, the rich and poor. Larger nations cannot usurp power from smaller nations. Little nations have more voice than the larger. A private brotherhood of corporatists are going throughout the world to “acquire” everybody else’s resources and rights and to set up controls. The U.S. and the monstrous UN bastardized our ideas. The few demagogues twisted concepts that are good for humanity so they could enslave the many. The U.S. president has now federalized and centralized power. The Senate is supporting it and Congress has no say. The people have no voice. We Indigenous have the moral authority over Great Turtle Island and the world. The Great Law is meant to bring harmony to the world. The U.S. and UN were supposed to spread the Great Law. Instead they have become victims of tyrants where everything is geared towards a military solution. The corporatists may have usurped the political and economic power over our territories. According to natural law, we Indigenous Peoples have the moral authority. We are warning the world that at this time Reason must prevail. Kahentinetha & Karakwine MNN Mohawk Nation News www.mohawknationnews.com kahentinetha2@yahoo.com katenies20@yahoo.com Note: At this time your financial help is urgently needed and appreciated. Please send your donations to PayPal at www.mohawknationnews.com, or by check or money order to “MNN Mohawk Nation News”, Box 991, Kahnawake [Quebec, Canada] J0L 1B0. Nia:wen thank you very much. Go to MNN “General” category for more stories on this; New MNN Books Available now! Purchase t-shirts, mugs and more at our CafePressStore http://www.cafepress.com/mohawknews; Subscribe to MNN for breaking news updates http://.mohawknationnews.com/news/subscription.php; Sign Women Title Holders petition! http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/Iroquois Gayanerekowa, the Constitution of the Iroquois Confederacy, MNN: NORTH AMERICAN INDIGENOUS HOLOCAUST: Charles Mann: 1491; Ward Churchill: A Little Matter of Genocide; Ronald Wright: Stolen Continents. Kissinger helped write US Policy, “The National Security Study Memorandum 200, Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for US Security and Overseas Interests”, Dec. 10, 1974 [NSSM200]. www.population-security.org UN adopted “World Population Plan of Action”, 1974. Obama’s National Security Advisor, James L. Jones, said, “I take my daily orders from Dr. Kissinger…”. www.infowars.com/nsc-advisor-jones-i-take-my-daily-orders-from-dr-kissinger Dr. Kissinger grinned at mention of the New World Order
before dismissing any knowledge of National Security Memo #200, which calls for the use of “food as a weapon” and otherwise advocates depopulation schemes that include extreme measures to be used against the ‘lesser developed countries’ in the third world, whose population growth supposedly threatens the National Security interests of the United States. Henry Kissinger's 1974 Plan for Food Control Genocide This article appeared as part of a feature in the December 8, 1995 issue of Executive Intelligence Review, and was circulated extensively by the Schiller Institute Food for Peace Movement. It is reprinted here as part of the package: “Who Is Responsible for the World Food Shortage?”
CATASTROPHIC TERRORISM: Prevention and Deterrence
Government agencies can do many things reasonably well, but strategic risk analysis is not one of them. A better alternative would be a nonprofit center for catastrophic terrorism risk analysis, under an FBI contract -- similar to the role of the rand Corporation early in the nuclear era.

Saturday, March 14, 2009

PROVINCE ORDERED TO JOIN IN COURT ACTION:Brantford, Six Nations INJUNCTION HEARING Posted By SUSAN GAMBLE, EXPOSITOR STAFF Posted 6 hours ago Justice Harrison Arrell ordered the province to join the court action that's part of Brantford's ongoing push for an injunction against native protesters. Lawyers for all others involved in the motion consented to the judge's order Friday. When lawyers for Ontario show up March 17, the judge plans to hear from everyone about how the province's involvement will play out. "Provincial participation will be determined after hearing submissions from all parties," Arrell said. He has already warned the city and Six Nations that his inclination is to order a court mandated consultation process that will force the parties to negotiate a settlement with one another. The city has been pushing for a long-term injunction against native protesters at development sites in Brantford, and have filed a $110-million court action against some of the protesters and the Haudenosaunee Development Institute. Brant MPP Dave Levac said the province will be fine with the judge's order. "We're ready to enter into negotiations at the level the judge is talking about," Levac said Friday. "We're already talking about a memorandum of understanding so I don't see why we wouldn't be a willing participant." Earlier this week, Levac opposed a private member's bill from MPP Toby Barrett, pushing for an inquiry into protests in Caledonia. Levac called the bill ill-advised and said it's premature to insinuate an injunction is an appropriate way to deal with protesters at this time. On Thursday, the judge and the lawyers involved pondered how a mandated consultation could proceed. They made suggestions about how long it might go on, how often they'll return to the court for guidance, who will pay if a negotiator is needed and what kind of provision will be included for emergency flare-ups. Arrell said he's likely going to have consultations include some future development and is unlikely to freeze development until a decision is reached on the injunction. "For you to tell me 'no permits' until I reach my decision is not feasible," Arrell told Lou Strezos, the lawyer for the Haudenosaunee Development Institute. "What I'm trying to do now is simply strike a balance. "You talk, Mr. Strezos, about a lot of good faith. I'm going to order (your clients) to consult and I'm going to order you people to try and settle this and if you don't settle it, you come back to court." The hearing continues Tuesday at 11:30 a. m. in Superior Court. More updates here ...

Thursday, March 05, 2009

B.C. moves to recognize First Nations rights The Canadian Press March 5, 2009 at 3:44 PM EST VICTORIA — The B.C. government is ready to introduce and pass legislation this spring that will fundamentally change the legal rights and status of First Nations in British Columbia. Aboriginal Relations Minister Mike de Jong told a gathering of native leaders that they will no longer have to turn to the courts to prove title over their lands. The proposed legislation would recognize aboriginal rights and title and would outline the terms for making decisions over lands and resources. The province's decades-long treaty-making process has resulted in few settlements. Unlike other provinces, B.C. never signed treaties with aboriginal bands and the province is now subject to hundreds of outstanding native land claims, which led to conflict and lawsuits over land use. The B.C. government, which faces a provincial election in May, says it has a strong aboriginal agenda for a third term in office.

Wednesday, March 04, 2009

Kanonhstaton: Dignity and Struggle Example of Dignity & Struggle: The 3rd Anniversary of Kanonhstaton From Arauco to Caledonia, Only Struggle Will Set Us Free! February 28, 2009 Today marks the third anniversary of the Reclamation of Kanonhstaton, "the Protected Place," in Caledonia, where a group of brave women and men decided to retake the struggle into their own hands, from centuries of shame, repression, humiliation, and insult. The action taken by the indigenous community of the Six Nations Grand River Territory (an hour and a half east of Toronto), was the only alternative to stop the construction of a massive residential complex, "The Douglas Creek Estates," set to be constructed by the edge of the reserve; a clear encroachment on indigenous territory. On that February 28, 2006, the cold air penetrated through to the bones... The cold; so profound and dense that is the "Canadian" winter. However, it was not an obstacle. The land and sky burned in Kanonhstaton, the heat of struggle expressed through the sacred fire, and life would begin to take its course to reclaim history their hands…. In those dark hands…Worn by time in the long wait…. Almost two months later, those actions would become more decisive; through an attempt of removal by police officials, the barricades were brought up. April 20th, 2006 was left written in the history of Six Nations, where the community stood up to repression and defended the Reclamation with their morale as their only weapon; site which has been maintained to this day. The Haudenosaunee, better known as the [Iroquois] Six Nations (composed of the Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, Seneca and Tuscarora nations) determined their own destiny on that day. Indigenous nations from what is known today as Upper State New York, in the United States, and southern Quebec and Ontario in Canada. Having had to deal with the empires of the world, they have been able to maintain their identity (with superhuman effort) of what it means to be a Nation. The treaties between the traditional Iroquois Confederacy and the English Crown (1677), were treaties that were made on a Nation to Nation basis. However once created, the Canadian State as all the other states in America, slowly begin to negate the treaties, further encroaching on lands, which is where the long road of resistance begins for our peoples. Yes, it is in this country [Canada], so hypocritically correct, where the Queen of England is still our Head of State, and where the worst atrocities have been committed against indigenous Nations. We will never forget, the pillaging of ancient communities, reducing them to simple apartheid-like reserves, separating them from the immigrating colonies, through contagious illnesses imported from Europe such as measles and alcoholism. We will never forget, the kidnapping of indigenous children, taking them from their parents, in order to put them into religious schools with the purpose of stripping their identity, to suffer ill-treatment, physical and sexual abuse on behalf of Catholic and Protestant Church. Creating inter-generational problems, such as abuse and suicide, the latter which is a staggering three times higher than the national average. We will never forget the 1924 Coup d'état to the Iroquois Confederacy, legitimate ancient government of Six Nations, which was interrupted by RCMP personnel at gunpoint, to impose the control system that is the Band Council, responding to the interests of the State. Robbing them of their spiritual instruments and garments to latter be given to museums as mere cultural artefacts....Etc... Etc... Yes, these things have been done to our indigenous nations, in this immensely politically correct country, and much more; but identity has to make its worth and its dignity is reflected in its people. Despite the genocide, they were never overcome or assimilated... That is the existing importance in this part of the continent. Identity and Nation. They are an indissoluble part of a same body, which does not negotiate its sovereignty... Their constitution [Six Nations] is the Great law of peace that allows their unity as a people. This marks a clear position unto the Canadian State; a relation on a nation to nation basis with their traditional government, the Iroquois Confederacy Council, and is made to be respected by their territorial struggle. We have the living example of Kanonhstaton in "Caledonia", which went beyond borders, and is a national and international reference point in the struggle for dignity. This could be taken as an example for the indigenous nations of our America, especially those in the south where the concept of "integration" is incredibly emphasized (by states and "progressives" of the governments in turn). Integration that is nothing less than to be an appendix of the state, its institutions, and political parties (of any colour). Such offerings do not respect or allow the true essence of indigenous sovereignty, which is to be territorially, culturally and ideologically sovereign. We, on this third anniversary, would like to express our most profound admiration and affection to Six Nations; their people and their struggle. Brave men and women that have not only been loyal to their people and their ideals, but also have had the great heart to surpass borders, giving their energy to other brothers that suffer there ... Beyond the Andes... Their admiration to the ancient struggle of our Mapuche Nation, has touched us deeply. We want help carry this message to our people as a symbol of unity and strength, the great energy of our peoples here in the north that have been able to resist, once and a thousand times unto adversity, greed, and the breakdown that imperial colonialism has tried to set in their communities. May the sacred fire, which gives the energy to maintain the struggle, reach your hearts. THEY DID NOT OVERCOME US YESTERDAY, LET US NOT LET THEM OVERCOME US TODAY WITH LEMUN & CATRILEO WE WILL OVERCOME MARRICHIWEU!!!!!!!!!!!! Chile: No Bicentenary on Stolen Native Land!! The Women's Coordinating Committee Chile-Canada Email: wccc_98@hotmail.com

Saturday, February 28, 2009

'We're just worried about the land' Posted By SUSAN GAMBLE, EXPOSITOR STAFF Friday night's TRUE meeting seemed to be a meeting of the minds. Four representatives of the Haudenosaunee Men's Fire offered a history lesson and an explanation of why land under construction by Empire Homes off Conklin Road and other properties in Brantford are so critical to the Six Nations people. And Caledonia resident Ken Hewitt -- once the spokesman for the Caledonia Citizen's Alliance -- explained why he's seeking a public investigation into a "two-tiered justice system" that he says favours natives. Hewitt has about 7,000 signatures on a petition calling for an Ipperwash-style inquiry into OPP actions. Hewitt said mistakes have been made on both sides and he feels the OPP have been victims of confused leadership. Haldimand-Norfolk MPP Toby Barrett, who supports the petition, told more than 100 people at Laurier's Odeon building that he doubts his private member's bill demanding an investigation will pass second reading in March. Also in the audience was Haldimand County Mayor Marie Trainer. The Men's Fire representatives -- Gene Johns, Stan Farmer, Wes Elliott and Kelly Curley -- worked to explain to the crowd that they operate under treaty law rather than Canadian law. The group, a traditional gathering that can include all men and is charged with the duty of protecting the land, the women and children, says it was reignited during the Douglas Creek Estates protest in Caledonia after being dormant for years. The protests at Empire Homes in particular are due to the land being part of the Clench tract, said Johns, which is a matter under litigation in the courts. "Everybody is worried about their home and getting eviction notices," said Johns. "Tell everybody their house is fine. We're just worried about the land." Johns -- who has been arrested for his part in trying to stop construction at the Conklin Road site -- encouraged people affected by the Empire protest or concerned about their own house to contact the Men's Fire representatives to talk. Farmer said the men were compelled to try and stop houses from being built on land they consider theirs as a way of protecting the remaining greenbelt areas. "Hamilton is having a problem with coyotes but you've interfered with their business, just like us. The animals need to have a place to hunt and fish, just like us." Audience member Gary Horsnell questioned why the Men's Fire is protesting at land it has no chance of having returned, according to the government. But Curley said that's the reason they protest at sites before houses are erected. "The federal government says it won't displace people, so if there's no house on the land, we have a right to that land." Farmer appealed to the non-natives in the crowd to consider the commitment and lack of sleep many of the protesters endure for their cause. "Don't look at me as a warrior or terrorist. I'm an individual born to an obligation. We're trying to keep the treaty of peace," said Farmer.

Thursday, February 19, 2009

"Community relations all important" Business, Aboriginal groups report
'Good things underway' between business, aboriginal groups: report Last Updated: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 | 5:48 PM ET CBC News Community relations is all important when companies deal with aboriginal communities in Canada, according to a report released Wednesday. The Canadian Council for Aboriginal Business analyzed dealings between 38 companies and aboriginal communities across the country. The analysis found that there are "good things underway" as businesses try to build positive working relationships. "Nothing else matters as much as productive and progressive community relations," Clint Davis, council president and chief executive officer, said in an interview on Wednesday. "Clearly, there is a perception that working with aboriginal communities can be overwhelming. You have three different groups — First Nations, Metis and Inuit — and within those groups, you have different languages, culture and circumstances." Davis said good community relations is the main ingredient common to all positive dealings between businesses and aboriginal communities within all three groups. He said the "good things" found by the report, include: Open and transparent communication, which involves companies gathering feedback on how their operations affect communities. Consultation that can lead to forming partnerships. A willingness to respect cultural differences. An understanding that all parties involved in the dealings need to benefit. For example, ESS/Compass Group Canada, which provides services to remote development projects, uses annual satisfaction surveys filled out by the chiefs in each community it operates to deal with concerns. And Syncrude, an oil sands development company that operates in northern Alberta, has established what it calls five "industry relations corporations in each of the aboriginal communities where it operates. The corporations include "standards of consultation" agreed to by both parties in each community, and provide forums to enable all parties to work together. The BMO Financial Group, in its dealings with aboriginal communities across the country, has an official policy not to use cultural images that have often been used in advertising aimed at aboriginal people. Depictions of eagles and feathers, for example, are prohibited in its advertising and promotional campaigns. The concern is that the use of sacred cultural symbols ultimately serves to reinforce stereotypes. All of the companies analyzed in the report took part in what the council calls its progressive aboriginal relations program, which was designed to encourage the full participation of aboriginal people in the Canadian economy. The company took part in the program between 2001 and 2008. Davis said the report found that money was not the most important factor in establishing good community relations. "In this economic climate, time and effort — not necessarily money — are the keys to establishing good relations."

http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/story/2009/02/18/aboriginal-business.html
VANCOUVER _ Some aboriginal groups in British Columbia scored two major victories Wednesday as the B.C. Court of Appeal ruled they must be consulted before projects are undertaken. The first ruling involves an appeal by the Carrier Sekani Tribal Council over a 2007 electricity purchase agreement between B.C. Hydro and Alcan in northwestern B.C. The court ruled that the B.C. Utilities Commission and BC Hydro failed to properly consult the First Nations. The power sales deal from Alcan´s Kemano facility was a condition set out by the company in order to proceed with a $2-billion upgrade. In approving the deal, the commission had ruled that no such consultations with the Carrier Sekani were necessary. The second case involved some First Nations in the southcentral Interior who said they were not properly consulted on a plan by BC Hydro and the BC Transmission Corp., to build a $700 million high-voltage transmission line from the Interior to the Greater Vancouver area. The court ruled in the Alcan case that it was an example of what was "foreseen by the Supreme Court of Canada in Haida Nation versus B.C. where the broad principles of the Crown´s duty to consult and, if necessary, accommodate aboriginal interests are to be applied to a concrete set of circumstances." In the Alcan ruling, the judges ruled that consultation arises in relation to BC Hydro´s decision to buy electricity from Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. that is surplus to its smelter requirements. The Carrier Sekani said the diversion of water for Alcan´s use infringes on its rights and title and that no consultation ever took place. In its unanimous decision, the judges ordered the utilities commission to reconsider the issue. In the second case, the court found that the decision to certify a new transmission line . . . "has the potential to profoundly affect the appellants´ aboriginal interests." "Like the existing line (installed without consent or consultation), the new line will pass over land to which the appellants claim stewardship rights and aboriginal title." The judge, also in a unanimous decision, said "if consultation is to be meaningful, it must take place when the project is being considered and continue until the process is completed." The court ordered the commission to suspend its decision and have a new hearing.
http://www.oilweek.com/news.asp?ID=21283

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Government policy created the myth of the "lazy Indian"
These people, once described as the “original affluent society” by anthropologists, now are the country’s poorest. It took a century of deliberate and careless policy by governments and industry to make them poor.
http://www.straight.com/article-201674/john-lutz-government-policy-created-myth-lazy-indian
Government policy created the myth of the "lazy Indian" By John Lutz Why, with all the resources the Canadian government pours into aboriginal communities, is the on-reserve Indian population among the most impoverished in Canada? Why do they rank poorest in Canada across the main measures of physical health (life expectancy, HIV/AIDS infection, diabetes rates) or social health (education, incarceration, suicide, substance abuse)? The government has tried its best and failed, and so it seems to many of us that the problem must lie with the aboriginal people themselves. The phrase “lazy Indian” rises into our minds, even if we are afraid to say it out loud. The stereotype of the “lazy Indian” starts early in the history of European colonization and is one of the most powerful and persistent. It is also one of the most perverse characterizations of a population that considered laziness to be one of the worst faults. A close look at our history shows that aboriginal people have historically been eager to work and that the poverty in so many First Nations communities is a phenomenon brought on by deliberate and inadvertent government policies over the past 60 years. It is well known that the first Europeans here wanted furs and traded them from aboriginal people. It is not well known that aboriginal people welcomed the traders, and in many cases, like the Lekwungen, helped build trading posts like Fort Victoria. It is even less known that aboriginal people were the first gold and coal miners in the province. The first coal mine in British Columbia, near present-day Port Hardy, was entirely worked over several years by the resident Kwakwaka’waka people. The next mine, at Nanaimo, depended on Sne ney mux men to keep it going. The first commercial fishermen and loggers in the colonies were aboriginal workers, and when the salmon-canning industry boomed in the 1880s, Native women canned the fish in industrial canneries from the Fraser River to the Nass, while their husbands caught the fish. The first modern sawmill in B.C. was built at Port Alberni in 1862, and over half the 200 to 300 workers were Nuu-chah-nulth men. The big sawmills established in the 1860s on Burrard Inlet employed “runaway sailors and Indians”, according to mill manager R.H. Alexander, used Squamish longshoremen, and bought their logs from the Sechelt people. Through the 19th century, aboriginal people worked as farmers and farm workers, stevedores and ships’ crew, and helped build the roads, railways, and public buildings. Franz Boas, the famous anthropologist, wrote in 1886 that “Almost all the labour of the province is done by Indians and Chinese” and all agreed that aboriginal people were well off—richer even than many whites. The 20th century has been hard on aboriginal people. The explosion of immigrants created new competition for jobs they used to hold and racism gave preference to the whites. With the immigrants came laws that deprived the majority aboriginal population of the vote, and confined them to reserves and inferior education. Without the vote, it was easy for white politicians and bureaucrats to discriminate against aboriginal people in issuing fishing licenses, logging permits, and grazing and water rights. They could not study law or operate many businesses. Other laws curtailed Native fishing for food to save salmon for the canneries, and hunting to protect game for sports hunters. The Indian agents warned their bosses of the consequences: “the game regulations...worked a great hardship on the Indians and thrown them more or less on relief [welfare]”. When labour was short during the wars, aboriginal people were again hired everywhere and were again pushed out when the soldiers came home; but after World War II it was no longer possible to live off the land. Until the 1950s, per-capita expenditure for social assistance or “welfare” for Indians was a fraction of that of other Canadians. By the 1970s, it was much higher and a generation of aboriginal children had grown up as “welfare Indians”. Today, there is enormous diversity between the poorest and richest in aboriginal communities, and between aboriginal communities, some of which are vibrant, healthy, and economically “comfortable”. But in many communities there are now several generations who have grown up in the welfare trap, with all the accompanying social problems that poverty brings. These people, once described as the “original affluent society” by anthropologists, now are the country’s poorest. It took a century of deliberate and careless policy by governments and industry to make them poor. It will take a new approach by government and all British Columbians to help them back to social and economic health. John Lutz is an associate professor of history at the University of Victoria, and the author of the new book Makúk: A New History of Aboriginal-White Relations.

Monday, February 16, 2009

Residential School Survivors Occupy St. Andrew's Wesley United Church to protect the remains of children killed at the Alberni residential School Two dozen aboriginal survivors of the Indian residential schools non-violently occupied St. Andrew's Wesley United Church in Vancouver today to stop the destruction of the grave sites of children who died at the former Alberni Indian Residential School. The protestors entered the church sanctuary as the worship service commenced and unfurled a banner declaring "All The Children Need A Proper Burial". After leafletting the congregation and making a statement, the protestors left, vowing to return if the United Church did not surrender the remains of native children who died under their care and halt further destruction of their burial sites. The occupation was prompted by the partial destruction this week of the last building of the United Church's former Alberni Indian residential school, where eyewitnesses claim that the remains of former students are buried. "They're destroying the evidence of their crime, and under the law, that's a crime" said Bingo, a survivor of the Alert Bay residential school. "We're not listening to their bullshit anymore. We'll be back with more people next time." Squamish hereditary Chief Kiapilano, who legally evicted the United Church from his territory last March, endorsed the occupation and called for similar actions by other residential school survivors. These occupations of United Churches during their Sunday services will continue and will escalate until the fallen children are brought home, their killers are brought to justice, and the residential school crime sites are all protected. Issued by The Friends and Relatives of the Disappeared (Vancouver) Contact: 1-888-265-1007 or 250-753-3345 www.hiddenfromhistory.org Note: A video transcript of today's occupation will be posted this week on the website, above, and is available on request. http://www.facebook.com/ext/share.php?sid=64768866488&h=NCNoz&u=geEa9

A blog about things no one wants talked about.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Latter Day Zombies

I rarely go to church but last Sunday in Vancouver I attended the occupation of Saint Andrew's Wesley United Church by survivors of Canada's residential school genocide. About twenty aboriginal men and women entered the church just as I was sitting down, and lined up in front of the altar holding a banner calling for the return of the 50,000 missing children's remains, and a proper burial. The church, which had been humming with pre-service chatter, suddenly became silent. After conferring quickly, the minister and one or two other robed officers approached the group and talked with them. For a few moments, the atmosphere was tense and uncomfortable. Then the minister addressed the congregation and welcomed "our friends" who had a message to deliver. He did this in a superficially friendly and grandstanding way that showed he was on top of the situation and knew exactly how to deal with it. The native men and women stood holding their banner. In contrast to the minister, none of them were smiling. They looked as if they had just absorbed another insult. No one in the congregation moved or responded. All eyes were focused on the visitors and the minister who stood awkwardly rubbing his hands together in one of those ritualized gestures expressing benevolence and Christian tolerance. The church seemed suddenly filled with the disappointment and anger of the native people. I felt tears welling up, inside and around me. When they all slowly turned and began silently filing down the aisle towards the front door, it was as if they had had enough of this place. I felt like running after them, but a family had just sat down next to me, blocking my exit. Once the natives had disappeared, the minister was all smiles again, calling on the congregation to "wave your hands wildly" and shout requests for favourite hymns. The heavy mood had lifted, and now we were going to be entertained by the Holy spirit. For the next hour, I squirmed in my seat as Rev. Gary Paterson nimbly ran through his scripted Sunday routine. First came a children's pantomime about Christ healing a paralyzed man, performed with stuffed bears and children led by Paterson. Next, a sermon about a minister's weekly struggle to make his sermons relevant to parishioners. At times he raised his arms and threw back his head as if receiving inspiration from heaven. He digressed briefly into a commentary on the "guests" who had interrupted the service, and from there he talked about "illness" and the case of the paralyzed man who was saved by the holy spirit descending through a hole in the roof. He talked about "sin" as the root cause of sickness -- an ancient belief that still has meaning today. Never once did he address the theme of guilt, or atonement for crimes against humanity. The United Church has nothing, apparently, to say about that. When we were asked to turn to the people around us and shake hands and greet one another in the "spirit of the Lord," I was forced to look into one smiling face after another. As mouths repeated the ritual line, eyes told another story. They were eyes I would instinctively have avoided, filled with coldness, fear, secrecy. I started to think there was something strange about this church and its congregation. I turned my head once or twice to look at them, standing in their rows, astonishingly alike in Sunday clothes, as if they knew what was expected of church goers. In his struggle to be relevant, the minister seemed almost like a marionnette, calling on us to stand up again and make a "joyful noise to the Lord." It was, he said, our time to "rock." The guitars came out and the middle-aged choir put on a pathetic show of belting out a few "contemporary expressions of faith." The minister joined in the rapture, shaking to the Muzak, letting it all hang out for Jesus. How people manage to go through these motions week after week without choking, is beyond me. It takes a stronger person than I to take part in an orgy of phoniness, and walk out feeling at one with God's love and light. By the time it was over, I understood my place in the universe: out on the street with the native people who must know by now to expect nothing from a church that has been taken over by latter-day zombies.

Sunday, February 15, 2009

In June 1813, Laura Secord overheard an American General scheming to attack the city of Drew Falls. Laura trekked 30 miles North to tell Canadians of the Americans plan to attack. With the help of Mohawk warriors, Laura Secord was able to warn Fitzgibbon, and the American invasion of Canada was stopped. http://www.rabble.ca/comment/988989/June-1813-Laura-Secord

Saturday, February 14, 2009

Journalists fail First Nations

By Christopher Clarke

News, by its very definition as an event outside of the ordinary, runs contrary to the best interest of First Nations people because it perpetuates well-established negative stereotypes of Aboriginal Peoples. And because this basic tenant of journalism is contrary to First Nations interests, and because journalists are, in the most part, ignorant of the historical and sociological contexts of First Nations issues, journalists have failed in providing adequate and complete coverage Aboriginal Peoples and their communities.

The situation in many First Nation communities is dismal, to say the least. We have all heard the stories of unsafe water, higher than average rates of suicides, alcoholism, drug addiction and abuses to numerous to mention. This is considered "ordinary" by most Canadians because it is what they are used to hearing about native peoples and their communities. It therefore takes an event bordering on catastrophe for a journalist to cover an issue within "Indian country." Of course, this steady stream of near catastrophic events only serves to reinforce the negative stereotypes that already exist of Aboriginal Peoples in the minds of Canadians.

What is not reported is as important, if not more so, than what is reported. As a student of journalism and a card-carrying Indian, I am constantly at odds with my chosen profession. While more native journalists working within mainstream media would help provide more complete and truthful coverage of aboriginal communities, simply having more native journalists will not solve the basic problems that exist with journalism as a whole. Journalists need to educate themselves as to the history and societal context in which First Nations exist, and they have failed to do so. This is not a failure only of journalism, but of mainstream society as well.

Journalists, while charged with reporting as an impartial observer of events, are still a product of the society that educated and informed their way of thinking. Even aboriginal people themselves are sometimes held hostage by the negative stereotypes perpetuated by mainstream society and its institutions.

The responsibility of a journalist is to recognize this and work to remedy the negative stereotyping of "the Indian". For too long, journalists have concentrated almost solely on the third world conditions of our communities, without reporting the positives. There are First Nations people who have, despite the conditions of their environment, succeeded in bettering their own lives, and the lives of those around them. There are communities that are socially, economically and politically healthy, but seldom receive any coverage for the progress they make. What is needed is a sustained, conscientious focus by journalists on the people who are our First Nations, and the successes that have they have enjoyed.

There is also more to the media's responsibility to Aboriginal Peoples than simply what is reported. There is also the question of how. Because non-native people are so far removed from the reality of aboriginal life in this country, sometimes the only perspective of First Nations people comes from mainstream media. Without reporting the historical and sociological context in which these stories exist, it is impossible to adequately, even truthfully, tell the stories of First Nations people.

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

HSN: Talks continue Feb 25
Talks Update, January 28, 2009
Representatives of the Haudenosaunee Six Nations (HSN), Government of Canada, and the Government of Ontario entered the first round of discussions January 28th at the Oneida Business Park. The Wednesday afternoon meeting opened with a preliminary consultation to discuss Canada’s December 12, 2007 $26 million dollar offer to settle historical grievances on the Welland Canal Claim. Haudenosaunee Six Nations principal negotiator Chief Allen MacNaughton responded to the proposed offer by reading the August 29, 2008 counter proposal letter to Canada’s 26 million dollar offer. Canada’s principal negotiator Ronald Doering responded to the Haudenosaunee Six Nations counter proposal communicating Canada feels it represented a fair offer of compensation for the Welland Canada Flooding and they [Canada] remains hopeful that the Haudenosaunee Six Nations will find some basis for moving forward. The Haudenosaunee Six Nations believe that compensation factor(s) for the Welland Canal flooding of 1829 and subsequent loss of the use of the land does not reflect in Canada’s current offer. Six Nations has estimated the true dollar amount of the Welland Canal Claim is more in the range of five hundred million to one billion dollars. The Haudenosaunee Six Nations is prepared to move forward with negotiations, focusing on land and perpetual care and maintenance for Six Nations. All parties agreed to meet on February 25, 2009 at the Oneida Business Park at 10:00 a.m. for a Lands Resolution Table Meeting. Canada will give its position papers on the Nathan Gage Claim and the Hamilton Port Dover Road Bed.
Ah! The Plank Road (bed). This will be interesting. http://www.sixnations.ca/LandsResources/cslc5.htm http://www.hsnnegotiations.com/index.html HAMILTON-PORT DOVER PLANK ROAD (HWY 6) SOUTH ... Port Dover Friday the 13th NORTH ... Hamilton West Harbour - Burlington Heights - High Level Bridge

Saturday, February 07, 2009

MISSING CHILDREN: Infamous Port Alberni dormitory to be demolished Tuesday ... but some say it should be investigated first: The digging is happening again, in just a few days, at the very place that robbed Harry of his childhood and life. The United Church's old residential school building in Port Alberni is being demolished by the government and its trained seals called the Nuu-Chah-Nulth Tribal Council, even though it's a proven crime site where hundreds of kids lie in unmarked graves. "When the girls were raped by the staff, they'd abort the babies and bury them between the walls, where nobody would find them" described Harriett Nahanee, who witnessed a murder at the school in 1946. "That old building is full of bones. They even had a cold storage room in the cellar where they kept the bodies before they buried them in the hills out back." That evidence will be obliterated on February 10, as the world watches and does nothing, as unmoved as when Harry tries to choose between a beating and merciless cold each night. (FULL TEXT BELOW) Infamous Port Alberni dormitory to be demolished Tuesday http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5ilz-9E2yE8ZjKo_X7N7hcTgdczAA VANCOUVER, B.C. — When Ben Nookemis was just another seven-year-old child torn away from his family and forced to attend the Port Alberni Indian Residential School, he and the other children would often pass the time crafting projects, such as stilts."We used to make them out of a two-by-two square piece of wood," he remembers.But it was on those stilts, and the extra height they provided his small frame, that Nookemis gained insight into the true horror of his surroundings."We would walk around on these things and it was just high enough for me to look into the supervisor's living quarters and I would see the supervisor sexually abusing these young girls," he says. Perhaps ... but perhaps there are also some truths to be reconciled first?
Feb 5
Harry Wilson, Continued: Why There is No Healing and Reconciliation
by Kevin Annett
I was going to begin this by observing that the poor, made and kept poor by us, are the only antidote to our self-deceptions. But to say so would be to repeat the crime, and use them, again, for our purpose. Instead, let his life judge us: Harry Wilson of the Heiltsuk nation, kidnapped and sodomized by Christians at age six, and for nine years after, at the United Church's Alberni Indian residential school; a witness to the violent murder of friends and relatives, and the discoverer of a young girl's dead body on the grounds of the school; drugged and straight-jacketed for a year when he spoke of what he saw to the Principal, another child rapist, who has never gone to jail. .................. Harry Wilson sleeps most nights now on the cold ground of Oppenheimer Park on pieces of cardboard he collects from nearby alleyways in Vancouver's downtown eastside. When he gets too cold, he risks dozing in the pews of nearby First United Church, where he usually gets beaten up and robbed. Last week, when I came across Harry slouched against a wall during one of my nightly walkabouts, the blood was still congealing over his swollen face. He wore no jacket, even though it was below freezing. "They took it when I was sleeping in the church" Harry muttered. "Took my coat, my watch, all my money. Then they socked me a few times." "Where was the night staff?" I asked him. "Aw, smoking crack outside. They don't do nothin' ..." First United Church proudly announced its "out of the cold" gimmick in December, opening their doors to the homeless at night thanks to a gift of $30,000 from city taxpayers to do what churches are supposed to be doing anyway. Before the handout, First United's doors stayed locked every night. One wonders what the $30,000 is being spent on, when Harry and other homeless aboriginals - made homeless by the torture they endured at the hands of the same United Church of Canada - can be so easily violated, once again. Beaten and robbed, while taxpayers fund crack-head church employees to sit outside. And they say the abuse stopped long ago. .................. East Hastings is like the Gaza strip: an urban concentration camp where the conquered are penned in and slaughtered when required. Harry is a veteran of the slaughter, somehow surviving it into his fifty sixth year. But he doesn't have much time left. Harry's steps are slower now, his face more sagging and worn, the scars bloodier and deeper each week, his hours utterly drowned by alcohol. He is dying in front of me, his life squeezed out by the same forces, to feed the same people. When the U.S. Army bombs civilians to pieces and then sends in their medics to treat the survivors, it's behaving exactly like the United Church of Canada, who first rape and kill innocent children in their residential schools, and then offer "healing" programs to those who survived. That's how the winners in history get to behave. The only real evidence of their crimes is people like Harry, and the bones of his friends who never made it out of the residential school. But church and state have shoved both Harry and those little corpses out of sight and mind: Harry to rot and die in obscurity on East Hastings street, and the bones of the dead to be dug up and destroyed. The digging is happening again, in just a few days, at the very place that robbed Harry of his childhood and life. The United Church's old residential school building in Port Alberni is being demolished by the government and its trained seals called the Nuu-Chah-Nulth Tribal Council, even though it's a proven crime site where hundreds of kids lie in unmarked graves. "When the girls were raped by the staff, they'd abort the babies and bury them between the walls, where nobody would find them" described Harriett Nahanee, who witnessed a murder at the school in 1946. "That old building is full of bones. They even had a cold storage room in the cellar where they kept the bodies before they buried them in the hills out back." That evidence will be obliterated on February 10, as the world watches and does nothing, as unmoved as when Harry tries to choose between a beating and merciless cold each night. The United Church will stand by and do nothing, pretending that it hasn't murdered Harry and thousands of others. The RCMP will stand by and do nothing, either, since they helped to bury the slaughtered children. But they have warned me not to interfere with their latest destruction of evidence of a crime. The killing and coverup continues. Welcome to "Beautiful British Columbia." ......................................................................................................... 5 February, 2009 Kevin D. Annett 260 Kennedy St. Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 2H8 250-753-3345 / 1-888-265-1007 The Friends and Relatives of the Disappeared www.hiddenfromhistory.org

Friday, February 06, 2009

Haldimand: Barrett's bill calls for inquiry into land disputes For Immediate Release February 5, 2009 Time to determine the truth about Caledonia - Barrett Private Members Bill calls for inquiry into land disputes Caledonia – When the Legislature resumes mid-February government will receive official notice of MPP Toby Barrett’s proposed legislation calling for an inquiry into the now three years of land disputes that have marred the landscape of Haldimand, Brant, Brantford and Six Nations. Barrett’s, “Truth about Caledonia Act, 2009” is set to be debated March 12th. Barrett’s Private Members Bill calls for an inquiry: 1. to determine the truth with respect to allegations of political influence in the court’s administration of justice and the police enforcement of the law with respect to activities in Six Nations, Haldimand County, Brant County and the City of Brantford; 2. to determine the truth with respect to the ownership of land within the boundaries of the former Haldimand Tract; and 3. to make recommendations directed to preventing similar chaotic confrontations when dealing with future land dispute issues in the province, including recommendations with respect to ways in which we can improve dispute resolution in this area and enhance respect for the courts and the rule of law; “As Opposition we began calling for an inquiry into Caledonia two and a half years ago – this proposed legislation builds on that motion, as well as Ken Hewitt’s petition to establish an inquiry into law enforcement,” stated Barrett. “It’s time we get all sides off this three-year hamster wheel.” Barrett pointed out that the Ipperwash report described inquiries as a way to “find out what happened – to look back,” as well as to “look forward,” and “propose policy reform.” The Haldimand-Norfolk MPP underlined his support for the public nature of inquiries as stressed in the Ipperwash report: “It provides a forum for citizens and groups to participate in the resolution of issues and the development of future policies…conducted in public view and with the participation of the public.” “As the impacts of the ongoing land disputes continue unabated, the need for an inquiry grows more urgent by the day,” Barrett concluded. “Just as the Ontario Liberals previously sought answers through three private members bills - and finally government legislation - creating the Ipperwash Inquiry, so too we need answers through a Caledonia Inquiry.” -30- For more information, please contact MPP Toby Barrett at (519) 428-0446 or (905)-765-8413, 1-800-903-8629 This is an interesting development. A petition was circulated, now with about 5000 signatures, but it was poorly written and focused on an inappropriate and personal vendetta against OPP Commissioner Julian Fantino. It appears that Toby Barrett has turned it into a more appropriate bill for discussion in the legislature. I think it's an excellent idea. Well, except #2. The Feds may not agree, since that's their responsibility.

Wednesday, February 04, 2009

Canada wants to improve human rights as nobody's perfect: justice official GENEVA — A Canadian official said Tuesday Canada has a good human rights record but there is always room for improvement.John Sims, a deputy minister of justice and head of the Canadian delegation to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, said Canada is proud of its record."No, it is not perfect, but it is very good," he said in an interview.He acknowledged that "nobody is perfect and that's true for Canada too. We know we can improve and we want to improve."The delegation is in Geneva to take part in the new Universal Periodic Review process at the UN Human Rights Council, which scrutinizes the record of its member countries.Much of the criticism of Canada from non-governmental organizations has been on the way its Aboriginal people have been treated."It's clear that there's been a very difficult past with Canada's Aboriginal people," Sims said. "Wrongs were done."He noted the prime minister made an apology last June "for the very sad legacy of the Indian residential schools.""So, we are trying to make amends. We are working very hard in partnership with Aboriginal communities to agree on the priorities that ought to be addressed and we are moving forward on a wide front on many, many issues." The UN council is spending several hours examining Canada's record. It is expected to report its findings and recommendations later in the week.Council members are looking at material presented by the government delegation as well as two independent reports providing less flattering views. A report by the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights compiles the observations and recommendations of experts in various fields.It notes that Canada has ratified 11 of the 16 core universal human rights treaties. When measured against many other countries, Canada comes out looking pretty good.But one group cited expresses concern that "Aboriginal and ethnic minority women suffer from multiple discrimination in employment, housing, education and health care, with high rates of poverty, lack of access to clean water and low school completion rates." The Special Rapporteur on adequate housing notes that for a highly developed, wealthy country, "Canada's poverty figures were striking."Another group of rights experts criticizes the broad definition of terrorism under the Anti-Terrorism Act. It calls on Canada to resist "racial profiling" and recommends that it include an explicit anti-discrimination clause in the law.The second parallel report submitted by 50 non-governmental organizations and other groups is even harsher in tone. It highlights the lack of equality, and the discriminatory treatment of Aboriginals, ethnic minorities, women and poor people.

http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/Highlights3February2009am.aspx A number of delegations also posed specific recommendations. These included: For Canada to re-consider its position and endorse the Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples; to consider ratifying ILO Convention 169; to ensure that all relevant recommendations of UN treaty bodies were fully taken into account and that these did not restrict the development of Aboriginal rights in the country; to redouble efforts to settle territorial claims by Aboriginal people; to establish immediate means of redress and protection of rights of Aboriginal people and other ethno-minorities; to give the highest priority to addressing inequalities between Aboriginal and other citizens in Canada, particularly in economic development, education, citizen empowerment and protection of the vulnerable, resolution of land claims and reconciliation, governance and self-governance; to continue its efforts to tackle discrimination against Aboriginal women; and to address the root cause of domestic violence against women, in particular Aboriginal women.

Other recommendations included: To consider specific legislation on domestic violence; to take measures to help the effective access to justice for victims of domestic violence; to criminalize domestic violence; to properly investigate cases of the death of indigenous women; to take on board the recommendations of CEDAW to criminalize domestic violence; to strengthen enforcement of legislations and programmes on prohibition of commercial sexual exploitation of children; to monitor closely the situation of victims of human trafficking, women migrant workers and women prisoners; and to conduct a review of the effectiveness of legislation relevant to trafficking in human beings and to implement reforms, where necessary, to strengthen the protection of the rights of victims of trafficking.

Additionally, States recommended that Canada: Give appropriate attention to end racial discrimination against the Arab and Muslim communities in Canada including racial and religious profiling; to avoid the misuse of procedures to profile on the basis of race, religion and origin; to apply provisions of its hate speech law in a non-selective manner to cover incidents that may lead to incitement to racial and religious hatred and violence; to review its discriminatory national laws on security and to adopt sensitization campaigns to protect racial profiling and stereotyping certain national ethic, descent and race with terrorism; to combat socio-economic discrimination; to address the root causes of discrimination; to consider ratifying the Convention of the rights of persons with disabilities; and to ensure appropriate representation of minority communities at all levels of government.

Another set of recommendations included: To submit to scrutiny the regulations governing the use of “Taser” weapons; to accede to the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture; to reinstate the current policy with regard to seeking clemency on behalf of all Canadian citizens sentences to death in other countries; to ensure that detention and prison facilities as well as standards for the treatment of juveniles were adjusted so that they were gender sensitive and ensure effective protection of personal safety of detainees and prisoners; to ensure effective access to justice; to consider ratifying the Convention on enforced and involuntary disappearances; to accede to the Convention on the Rights of Migrant Workers and Members of their families; to make immigration procedures more transparent and objective and take concrete measures; to accede to the pending visit request of the Special Rapporteur on human rights of migrants; and to launch a comprehensive reviews leading to legal and policy reforms which protected the rights of refugees and migrants.

Other recommendations included: To ratify international human rights instruments it had yet to; to establish an effective and inclusive process to follow up on UPR recommendations; to associate itself with the Institution Building package of the Human Rights Council; to intensify efforts to ensure that higher education was equally accessible to all on the basis of capacity; and to take on board the recommendations of the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing, specifically to extend and enhance the national homelessness programme and the Residential Rehabilitation Assistance Programme.

Monday, February 02, 2009

Protect Mother Earth GEORGE BEAVER As a young boy growing up at Six Nations, I was exposed to the Haudenosaunee concept of conservation of our natural environment for the sake of our future generations. I remember reading the community newsletter called The Pine Tree Chief. It was a forerunner of the present weekly newspaper, the Tekawennake. In it, Andrew Jamieson, a teacher, writing about an old native hunter, said, "He never took more than he needed." The operative word here is "need" not "want." When hunting we may want to kill more than we can eat but if we remember our future generations, they, too, will need a share of nature's bounty. And that bounty extends further than just to animals, fish and birds. Clean water, pure air and rich soil for growing food is also a part of our environment that needs our protection. Our ancestors believed that it was their responsibility to protect Mother Earth. When their generation passed on, this responsibility was passed down to the next generation. This idea of stewardship of the Earth is also found in most First Nations of North America, not just among the Six Nations. This may be the reason history tells us the indigenous people had such a horror of selling land. In their philosophy, land, water and air were all regarded as necessities of life. As such they are priceless and not to be bought or sold. All of the present generation of all races should be taught that when we conserve our natural resources we are helping our children and grandchildren to survive. Furthermore, the unpolluted land, air and water we pass on to them will provide a healthy and happy environment in which they can live and thrive. What a shame on our present generation if we pass on polluted water, land and air to our future generations. It would be especially shameful for this to happen here in Canada, one of the richest countries on Earth. Surely polluting factories and businesses could set aside some of their great wealth and clean up the messes they create before it gets into our water and air. It is especially crucial that the earth itself is not polluted. To many people, the planet Earth is not just our home, it is Our Mother. After we are born we live on milk which indirectly comes from food grown on the earth. As we grow and develop teeth, we learn to eat the meat of animals that ate plants that grow on the earth. We also eat plants that grow on the earth. In a real sense the earth sustains us and keeps us alive. Many native people, both here and in the U. S. take very seriously their responsibility to protect and conserve the natural environment and Mother Earth.
BRANT COUNTY: Committee overrides provincial policy, rezones farmland.
The committee was willing to override its own planning department and provincial policy, and proceed with the rezoning of about 400 acres of farmland.
http://www.brantfordexpositor.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1415057 Cainsville a developer's paradise? Posted By MICHAEL-ALLANMARION Updated 14 hours ago Some major plots of farmland just north of Cainsville are yielding an unusual harvest of social conflict. Three outside development companies -- Alberta-based Hopewell Development Inc. and two Toronto area companies, First Urban of Concord and the Sorbara Group of Vaughan -- have raised the ire of some local residents and the political temperature of Brant council with their plans to build homes and a business park on farmland they've acquired on the east side of Garden Avenue, north of Highway 403. First Urban, Hopewell and Sorbara propose three separate development areas, including two residential neighbourhoods and a business park that would dramatically transform the cash crop fields that surround Cainsville. Overall, the plan includes about 1,700 housing units, surrounded by parks, a trail system and businesses. The largest parcel proposed for development, is a 218-acre site owned by First Urban that could accommodate up to 1,116 housing units. North of that, Hopewell developments wants to create a 135-acre business park that would include more than 2 million square feet of space for businesses. Sorbara wants to build between 590 and 704 homes on a 184-acre site, located north of Lynden Road. The land is zoned for agricultural uses and is still designated that way in the county's official plan update. When some of those plans came up for scrutiny in two meetings of the county's planning advisory committee during the past two weeks, a lot was heard about a bright future for Cainsville. A lot more was revealed, however, about the suddenly professed peril of the county's fiscal soul and the ebbing political will of councillors. According to the discussion being carried on by agents for the developers, several councillors and some of the residents, it would appear that the land whose fate they were pondering is marginal from an agricultural standpoint. Its best crop would be houses and business buildings, and its true value is to be found in the development charges and tax revenues.

And of course, that's all that matters ... money for developers and the council. Quality of life? Greenspace? Phhht ! ... Green...money!money!money! BRANTFORD CITY

Calnan quits committee http://www.brantfordexpositor.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1416374 City Coun. James Calnan says he has no choice but to resign from a committee that deals with First Nations issues to avoid rules that continually would muzzle him. Read Tuesday's Expositor for the full story.

Sunday, February 01, 2009

Rights of Indigenous Peoples of Canada

Pathways to an ethic of struggle (Taiaiake Alfred)

Canadian Dimension Magazine, January/February 2007 Issue

My discovery of what colonization really is took a long time in coming. It took a long time because you can’t understand the impact of these powerful forces of disconnection upon our people until you work within this system and try to make change. That’s the reason why this understanding is the sum of my own political experience, my lived experience. But it took a really intense effort over the past ten or twelve years to come to an intellectual understanding of it, and really to find a way to articulate it.

Lack of Self-Government?

In my first book, I wrote that the problem was a lack of self-government. Back then, that’s the way the problem of colonization was defined. It’s still the dominant discourse in Native communities.

But from the personal perspective of a person from Kahnawake and a person who has travelled and talked to a lot of Native people who still have a commitment to our ancestors’ objectives and to the values and principles of living like an indigenous person in a modern era what I found was this: Self-government isn’t enough. In fact, it is a kind of Trojan horse for capitalism, consumerism, individualism.

So, in my own path, I shifted political affiliations. I had managed to work my way up from a measly researcher/coffee go-getter for guys like Billy Two Rivers and Joe Norton, guys who I still really respect and learned a lot from. I worked my way up to senior advisor on land and governance, and I had started taking on a lot more responsibility. But when you come to the realization that it’s taking you in a direction not consistent with the direction that your ancestors would have you go you have a choice to make and it’s this: Do I embark on a different pathway? Or do I remain on this pathway, but compromise my idea of what it is to be a Mohawk?

Now, anybody who knows the language, the ceremonies, the teachings anybody who has heard traditional elders talk about what it is to be a Native person they are all very, very clear about your responsibilities, your roles, your relationship to the land, your relationship to one another. Those lessons are so, so profound and so clear when you hear them, and they are taught to us over and over and over again. So, when you are on this pathway, you find yourself coming to the point where you have to give up what you’ve accomplished your position, your salary, your consulting fees.

And you have to re-imagine what the elders would have wanted you to do.

Heeding the Voices of the Ancestors

So, I titled my next book, Heeding the Voices of Our Ancestors. This was because I found myself reinterpreting the voices of my ancestors rather than heeding the voices of the ancestors. I figured it’s time to get out of that business.

Luckily for me, I had a day job, teaching in a university. I realized that teaching affords a person a lot of insulation in terms of freedom of movement and thought. You have a job and you have a means to sustain yourself that’s not dependent upon the political structure that you’re working with at any one time. So, taking advantage of that shifted directions a little bit.

The book was an exploration of what it would be to be a traditional leader today. I really took my task seriously, saying to myself: “If I listen to all the teachings, if I listen for hours and hours and if I read as much as I can, and if I put as much intellectual energy as I have and try and understand what it is to be, in our language, a chief which literally translates as ‘a good man’ how would I do that today?”

And what I found it involves is a traditional ceremony from the Mohawk, from the Iroquois culture actually, Haudenosaunee culture. It’s the condolence ceremony when a chief passes away or a clan mother passes away. A new one is raised up and there’s a whole cycle of ceremonies where different elements of leadership are brought to this person. This is all done through songs, teaching and speeches.

A Revival of Traditional Forms of Government

Of course, that led me to a second level: It isn’t enough just to have space; you need to fill it up with something indigenous. The answer I came to is, that what we need to do is this: We need to revive our traditional forms of government. We need to raise up the long house again, so to speak; we need to raise up those chiefs, those clan mothers; we need to rebuild the long house. We need to restore our traditional forms of government. It’s a dominant theme in Native communities that traditional government is the antidote to the corruption, to the abuse of power, to the disempowerment of our communities.

But there’s a fundamental problem there, too. The fundamental problem is that our people are not the same as they were a hundred or two hundred years ago, when these traditional governments were functioning in their full power and their full capacity. In saying this, I am not pointing fingers. I’m more looking in the mirror and looking at my family, my friends and everybody I know. I don’t think anybody would disagree that our people collectively today have been weakened by colonization. Our language, our culture, our understanding of history, our sense of trust, our wholeness, our relationships, the power that we possess as individuals and as family, the ability to work together, the unity that we had that is the foundation of everything for our people our understanding of our relationship to nature, our communication with the spirit world.

In all these ways we really have lost a lot.

Yet the systems of government that we’re trying to bring forward and raise up again as traditional forms of government are crucially dependent on the very things we lack today. So, it’s not enough to call for traditional government. It started to dawn on me that the problem really is the way we have been de-cultured as a people. We’ve been disconnected from who we are as a people, from the sources of our strength and our very survival: land, culture, community. Those things have been broken, or nearly so, by colonization.

In my view, that’s really the root of the problem. Colonization is a process of disconnecting us from our responsibilities to each other and our respect for one another, our responsibilities and our respect for the land, and our responsibilities and respect for the culture. It’s that simple and that profound. It took me fifteen years to work it through. I went through the educational system and the political system. Some people might say, you should have just opened your ears and listened when the elders told you that to begin with. But I was 24, and I didn’t really listen that well. I had to learn from experience and go down those other pathways to figure out what the problem was.

Modernity and Aboriginal Identity

The eventual solution the one with integrity for our people is one that allows us to remain indigenous and still engaged with modern society. That’s the hope.

more ...

http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2007/01/04/826/

Saturday, January 31, 2009

SIX NATIONS AND BRANTFORD: Wouldn't a partnership be a better way to move forward?

"While maverick city Coun. James Calnan faced a barrage of criticism for breaking ranks over the city's legal action; he was right when he said the city should follow up with some sort of peace overture, instead of just legal confrontation." (Expositor editorial Jan. 7, 2009)

Six Nations has, to my personal knowledge throughout the past 33 years, made direct efforts to educate, inform and work, when possible, with the City of Brantford while respecting and protecting Six Nations land rights. Previous city councils led by mayors Charles Bowen, David Neumann, Karen George, Bob Taylor and Chris Friel have all interacted with us in efforts to move forward through similar turbulent times.

No doubt the present Mayor Mike Hancock, with his 20 years experience on city council, is also aware of these efforts and must continue with such diplomacy. And Six Nations must continue to extend the olive branch in answer to C. Orville Garlow (Expositor Opinion page, Jan. 8, 2009) because fairness and diplomacy are who we are.

Many of the city's previous mayors and councils have been Six Nations' best allies; lobbied for us and with us with no less than 19 federal ministers of Indian Affairs, numerous members of parliament and the provincial legislature in attempts to pressure Canada to resolve Six Nations' outstanding land issues in a fair and just manner.

Going forward with the City of Brantford, there is a way!

With the economy crashing into a recession, there is a great opportunity for business in implementing the Six Nations/City of Brantford Feb. 4, 1997 agreement. Six Nations can partner with investors on lands within the city of Brantford, be it an abandoned business site (to preserve as much farmland as possible) or a new site for business that meet our criteria and approval.

The lands will be held jointly by Six Nations and the developer/investor; exempt from municipal or provincial taxation per the terms of this 1997 agreement, our unique situation and the province's own legislation.

The developer/investor would pay what was saved in taxes to Six Nations to be used to repay the developer/investor the amount they initially paid for the disputed lands.

Upon the investment for the land repaid, the title will be transferred to where it should be, Six Nations.

The businesses would be issued long-term leases with lease payments securing Six Nations' perpetual care and maintenance, honouring the intent of our original agreements we had with our neighbours and the Crown. Certainty for investments would be achieved.

The City would be paid for the services they provide (fire, water, sewer, policing, garbage, etc.). Businesses would thrive having the advantage of commerce in a tax-free zone. Everyone would be working. Employment, training and apprenticeships would be available to everyone.

Six Nations would finally be included in the economy. Canada's legal duty to settle the land rights of the Six Nations People remains intact, but now big business and the City will be our allies, prompting Canada to settle with Six Nations.

The expected federal infrastructure dollars and economic stimulus package being proposed in the federal budget can only help if properly leveraged.

To date, the required investors and developers are excited and the province appears willing to amend the legislative changes arbitrarily implemented in 1997 that might have been an excuse for the City not to honour their part of the Feb. 4, 1997 agreement with Six Nations.

City of Brantford, it's your move.

Or would the City of Brantford rather be known as the place where uncertainty of land title has developers and investors suing the City and going elsewhere. Or Brantford, a place where Jane Doe, John Doe and Persons Unknown are not welcomed and subject to arrest. Or the City of Brantford, a place where Indian Fighting Lawyers and the Army are being sought to handle those pesky Indians.

Brantford, could your image get any worse?

Phil Monture

Six Nations

http://www.brantfordexpositor.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1409631&auth=

NATIVE LAND CLAIMS

I disagree with Mr. Andrew Robinson's opinion in his Jan. 24 editorial that we, including councillors, should keep our attention and action focused on a negotiated settlement.

A negotiated settlement is, of course, the key, but Mr. Robinson has failed to consider a critical element in his reasoning -- the length of time it will take to reach a negotiated settlement. Just how long will it take to settle the land claims? Less than 12 months, a few years, or, decades?

The answer is in the following: Mr. Phil Monture, an expert in Six Nations land claims, who provides support to the federal negotiations, and who was instrumental in the City of Brantford/Six Nations 1997 agreement during the Mayor Chris Friel era, has made extra and painstaking notes on his technical work and in-depth knowledge because he says he will not be alive to see the day the land claims are settled.

The citizens of Brantford and the city and its deteriorating reputation and economy cannot wait this long until the land claims are settled. Holding the long breath is unrealistic, especially when peace-evoking solutions are within arms reach.

Danica Vanpopic

Brantford

http://www.brantfordexpositor.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1413661&auth=

Facing up to Canada's dark history

By Lorraine Mallinder Kahnewake, Canada
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/7860552.stm

From the late 19th Century up to the 1970s, an estimated 150,000 native children in Canada were seized from their parents and sent far away to state-funded, church-run schools to learn how to think, speak and act like white people. The country is still coming to terms with the disastrous results.

Archive images from inside Canada's aboriginal residential schools

Maybe I picked a bad day to visit. The place is a ghost town.

I came here with the idea of taking a mental snapshot of life in Kahnewake, exclusively populated by members of the Mohawk nation, at the beginning of an important year for Canada's relations with its native peoples.

In the coming months, a Truth and Reconciliation Commission will start touring the country to heal the scars of the residential schools system, a policy that resulted in thousands of deaths and devastated lives.

With an estimated 80,000 former pupils still around today, many of whom witnessed or suffered sexual, physical and mental abuse, the debate over how much truth will be needed for reconciliation is stirring controversy.

Bitter memories

Back in the freezing present, I duck into a smoke shop, selling tax-free tobacco, for shelter. Star Eagle greets me from behind the counter and, eyeing my numb face with bemusement, offers me a coffee.

"Truth and reconciliation? I ain't never heard of that," she says when I ask whether she is aware of the new commission. Now in her 50s, she has bitter memories of the residential schools regime.

Map of canada

"People here are heart-broken about what they went through," she tells me. "They show their hearts on their faces and they don't know it."

"I call it hard face," she says. Her eyes deaden and her features tense in a depiction of life in Kahnewake.

Away from the reserve, in Ottawa, the Canadian capital, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission has suffered some loss of face.

Launched last year, it has had trouble getting off the ground. Its chief commissioner, a Mississauga Indian and a judge on the Ontario Court of Appeal, resigned in October after tussles over the body's mandate.

As the politicking over his replacement continues, the public spotlight has been shifting from the healing of the living to the raising of the dead.

It is accepted knowledge that a large proportion of the children, some estimates run into tens of thousands, died of tuberculosis in the cold, filthy schools.

Spirit of the dead

But recently, the story has taken a darker turn, as allegations of secret burials in mass graves, death by torture and fatal medical experiments have begun to surface.

The man behind the new allegations is Kevin Annett, a defrocked Vancouver priest who was thrown out of the United Church in the mid 90s for exposing the schools scandal and challenging the clergy's sale of native lands.

Whatever emerges from the process of truth and reconciliation, the ghosts will not go quietly

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission cannot, under the terms of its mandate, subpoena documents or witnesses to investigate the claims. It has, however, ordered research into possible burial sites.

It has also floated the idea of holding traditional ceremonies to ask the spirits of the dead children to return home to communities like Kahnewake.

Annett tells me this is a cover-up. He wants a Nuremberg-style tribunal to hold government and church officials accountable for genocide. He also wants the children's bones to be dug up, forensically tested and returned home.

I ask some native people about their views on Annett's campaign and receive a complex set of responses. While most say there is an element of truth in the shock allegations, not everyone supports the former priest.

Willie Blackwater, a Gitxsan Indian, is well known in Canada for his landmark victory against the church and the government in a sexual abuse lawsuit in the 90s.

He resents the idea that Annett, a white man who has never attended residential school, has somehow become the public face of the dead children. He believes Annett has "disgraced" native people with his public demands for the dead to be repatriated.

I ask Blackwater what kind of outcome he would be happy with. He supports the truth and reconciliation process, but thinks that native people should be in charge.

'Locked in pain'

I get the sense from my discussions with him and others that native people feel the Church and state, the white establishment, are driving the whole healing process. They feel excluded from the real decisions on truth and reconciliation.

Maybe it stems from the experience of everyday life on reserves like Kahnewake, cut off from mainstream Canadian society, with no political or economic clout.

The segregation is both enshrined in federal laws that define native status and self-imposed by wary native communities that frown upon intermarriage with outsiders.

People in isolated reserves like Kahnewake are still haunted by memories of the residential schools era. For many, it is a world of drug and alcohol addiction, violence and high suicide rates.

"Sometimes I feel people get annoyed with me for trying to be happy," says Star Eagle. "They're all locked in together with their pain."

There is a real sense of foreboding as Canada prepares to come to terms with its dark history. Whatever emerges from the process of truth and reconciliation, the ghosts will not go quietly.

From Our Own Correspondent was broadcast on Saturday 31 January, 2009 at 1130 GMT on BBC Radio 4. Please check the programme schedules for World Service transmission times.

Friday, January 30, 2009

Six Nations, Canada: Negotiations update Federal government deems $500 million compensation "implausible" and "inflated" http://www.dunnvillechronicle.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1411793 Seven months after talks were suspended, Canada and Six Nations remained far apart in their positions on financial compensation for lands flooded during construction of the Welland Canal. At their Jan. 28 meeting, both parties read statements into the record. Haudenosaunee Confederacy representatives formally presented a position paper mailed to their Canadian counterparts last fall. In it, they rejected the $26 million settlement proposal and tagged the past to present value of 2,500 acres of flooded land at $500 million. They also indicated they were open to discussion on the issue. On behalf of Canada, senior federal negotiator Ron Doering read a statement saying $26 million was fair offer arrived at in good faith. Later he told reporters that the federal government was firm on that sum. Both parties will spend a month considering this week's exchange of positions. According to Six Nations Mohawk Chief Allen MacNaughton, who is on the negotiating team, the Confederacy will discuss Canada's response in council and band council members do their own review. Then the $26 million offer and responses to negotiation principles will be presented at community meetings in Six Nations. Negotiators meet next on Feb. 26 when Doering wanted the parties to set a schedule for meetings up to June. MacNaughton told reporters that many ideas in Doering's statement were "non starters". He was especially disappointed that the federal government does not recognize the Confederacy as a government. As well, chiefs told their federal counterparts that they are very concerned about people being arrested while development continues. This is occurring while provincial, federal and Six Nations representatives try to resolve these issues, MacNaughton noted. When asked if Ontario or Canada would walk away from negotiations if demonstrations acNaughton turned the tables. "The question is will we keep coming to their table as long as there's development," he noted saying this will be seriously considered. According to Doering's reading notes, Canada gave much thought to its response to the Six Nations $500 million value for the Welland Canal claim. He noted that Six Nations used selective application of Canadian legal principles for commercial compensation to arrive at the sum instead of applying principles used in courts to set compensation for aboriginal historic claims. "We believe that your approach leads to an implausible and inflated value and is not a practical basis for settlement," Doering said in the "without prejudice" response paper. He said it was unsupportable to calculate a value back to 1829 based on full compound interest for the entire sum. To reach their compensation level, the federal government relied on actual account patterns and past and present land values in the context of historical and economic information, he added. In their response, Six Nations said they will not relinquish rights or interest in lands for which they receive financial settlements. Doering said Canada's view is the flooded lands were surrendered in 1831, 1834 and 1844. To compromise, the $26 million offer left rights in place but also sought a promise that Six Nations would not act on them, he added. Before Canada provides compensation, it must be certain that further claims or occupations of these lands will not occur, stated Doering. "It is a matter we need to explore further if we are to reach an agreement on any of HSN's historical claims," he stated. Both MacNaughton and Doering realized the relationship between Six Nations and the Crown must be rebuilt. Doering suggested shaping it toward the future while respecting the past. "The nature of the relationship and the respect to us is paramount to be able to move forward with this process," said MacNaughton. In response to Six Nations suggestions for future negotiations, Doering rejected a proposal for new legislation requiring the three parties to negotiate. He also said the specific and comprehensive claims policies do not limit negotiations but also indicated that federal policy or "law applying to Indians" might govern negotiations in some cases. Willing to explore Haudenosaunee jurisdiction over its lands and people, Doering said the lands will not be completely immune in all circumstances from federal or provincial laws. In their statement, the chiefs asked Canada to commit to mediation if the talks fail. In response, Doering said the federal government does not agree to that at this time. Instead the federal government is willing to resort to judicial resolution in the courts as a negotiation alternative. Both federal and Six Nations representatives did agree to reviewing the negotiation process itself. MacNaughton said he wanted to see the main table remain in place. Other side tables or committees might no longer be necessary, noted Doering. He pointed out that Ontario has suggested a land use planning committee but Six Nations has not accepted the proposal. It was suggested by former provincial negotiator Murray Coolican as an alternative to demonstrations and occupations or reclamations of pieces of property. For the new provincial negotiator, Tom Molloy, this was his first meeting. He said it would take several to get to know people and to get up to speed on the issues. Even he was briefed, he said it was a lot different hearing from the parties at the table. Copyright © 2009 Dunnville Chronicle
START OVER! -Residential schools commission to start from scratch By Norma Greenaway, Canwest News Service January 30, 2009 4:08 PM Retired Supreme Court justice Frank Iacobucci will name a selection committee to conduct the search for new commissioners, an announcement due Friday will state. Retired Supreme Court justice Frank Iacobucci will name a selection committee to conduct the search for new commissioners, an announcement due Friday will state. Photograph by: Jean Levac, Ottawa Citizen OTTAWA — The troubled federal commission into Indian residential schools will be remade with three new commissioners, ending months of agonizing over how to respond to the surprise resignation of its chairman, Henry LaForme, in October. The government and parties to the residential schools agreement announced Friday a selection committee has been struck to find a new chairman and two commissioners as quickly as possible. Retired Supreme Court justice Frank Iacobucci, who will be the chairman of the selection committee, facilitated the agreement. Indian Affairs Minister Chuck Strahl said the move promises a "fresh start" for the battered commission. Strahl said he is optimistic a new three-panel commission will be in place within weeks, and that he also is satisfied all parties now are "crystal clear" about how the commission will operate. "It's going to make it easier to recruit commissioners," he said in a telephone interview. The disruption caused by LaForme's angry departure has already slowed the work of the five-year, $60-million Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Among other things, it was forced to cancel opening hearings slated for this month. The commission is charged with collecting stories from victims of abuse in the residential school system and encouraging reconciliation within Canadian society over the dark chapter in the country's history. LaForme set off a storm of charges and counter charges when he quit, saying he could not get along with his two fellow commissioners. He accused them of trying to usurp his power as chairman, and also complained, through a spokesman, of interference by the Assembly of First Nations. The two remaining commissioners — lawyer Jane Morley of British Columbia and Claudette Dumont-Smith, a Quebec health specialist — announced they were stepping aside, and that their resignations would take effect June 1, 2009. "We regret that we will not be continuing as commissioners for the full five-year mandate," they said in a joint statement. "However, we have become convinced that the time has come for us to step aside and let others take on the demanding but rewarding mission." They said they continue to "disagree" with LaForme's stated reasons for quitting, but did not elaborate. Instead, they urged all parties to the residential school agreement, among them the United, Anglican and Catholic churches, the Assembly of First Nations and the federal government, to focus on getting the commission back on track as soon as possible. Strahl characterized the outgoing commissioners' June 1 resignation as a technicality, and said he was confident a new three-panel commission would be in place long before that date. In a separate statement, Iacobucci said the selection committee would welcome nominations of individuals to serve as commissioners. He also praised all those involved in the process of finding a way to move forward, and that he saw no evidence of anyone trying to interfere in the work of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. The selection committee includes Phil Fontaine, national chief of the Assembly of First Nations; Mary Simon on behalf of Inuit representatives; Michael Wernick, deputy minister of the Department of Indian Affairs; Rev. James Scott on behalf of the Anglican, Presbyterian and United churches; Pierre Baribeau, on behalf of Catholic entities, and Len Marchand on behalf of claimants under the Indian Residential School Settlement Agreement. Fontaine said he's satisfied the commission will be back on track very soon, and ready to hear from survivors of the schools who are anxious to tell their stories. "This actually has presented us with a good opportunity to relaunch the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and do it in a way that has three commissioners very focused and committed to getting things right," Fontaine said in an interview. © Copyright (c) Canwest News Service
World Social Forum and Forest Defenders Unite Thursday, 29 January 2009 20:12 SOS Amazon! – “World Social Forum” Lends Indigenous Leaders and Supporters Opportunity to Defend Amazon Rainforest by Shelley Bluejay Pierce As world leaders focus on severe economic crisis in their homelands, an estimated 100,000 activists traveled from all over the world to attend the World Social Forum in Brazil. Critical environmental impacts in the Amazon rainforest regions brought Indigenous tribal representatives from across Latin America, environmentalists and supporters together for the multi-day event. One full day during the World Social Forum will focus on issues impacting the Amazon rainforest and the resident tribal nations who dwell there. Led by Indigenous people from all across Latin America, over 1000 participants formed a human banner, using their bodies, to draw attention to the increasingly precarious situation of the Amazon rainforest. The wording was formed around the massive silhouette of an indigenous warrior taking aim with a bow and arrow. (photo courtesy of Lou Dematteis/Spectral Q.) Prior to constructing the human-banner, Brazil’s leading Amazonian Indigenous organization, COIAB, released this statement: “With the permission of our ancestors’ spirits, we indigenous peoples are here with our friends from all corners of the earth. We build this symbol with our bodies as the cry of living beings from this green forest, this planet, for our continuity as humans and diverse creatures. The symbol of the bow and arrow has three meanings: The first, our aim that every man, woman, and child will decide to care for our planet; The second, the position of defending the rights of indigenous peoples, of nature, of the planet, and of our home the Amazon; The third, to send a message to the world so that each of us helps to protect our home, our air, our water, our food. The Datsiparabu ceremony is the purification of our minds, our spirit, our soul, and our hearts. Save the Amazon!” BELEM, Brazil - These words and their message resonate with Indigenous peoples worldwide who face the destruction of their lands, culture and traditions. Mining operations, agricultural development and the endless grab for unoccupied land have forced millions of indigenous people worldwide from their traditional homelands and traditional ways. Across the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and a host of other countries, the Indigenous people are uniting and waging their own wars against the ruination of their lands. Governmental policies, often times made with little to no involvement by the Indigenous representatives, have decimated entire tribal groups and wrecked havoc with sensitive ecosystems. The remnants of post-mineral extraction, often grossly unregulated and mismanaged, have left their people to contend with death or illness, lack of safe water supplies and other toxic contamination. Agricultural developments have stripped the land of needed indigenous plant species and animals and forced many tribes far from the lands they have inhabited for centuries. Fighting onto the world’s political and environmental stage has not come easily, or quickly enough, to save many Indigenous peoples from the disastrous impacts of global resource development. One such case involves the landmark case against Chevron-Texaco and oil exploration in Ecuador. Contamination from petro-chemicals led to scientific reports revealing local water samples with toxic chemical levels thousands of times higher than permitted by Ecuadorian and U.S. environmental laws. Ecuadorian cancer rates were highest in the region where Texaco operated its drilling operations. The toxic waste may have contributed to hundreds of lives lost, the extinction of one Indigenous group and the endangerment of two others. (see related article at: http://www.chevrontoxico.com/article.php?id=362) “Indigenous people hold their traditional weapons skyward as they formed the human banner ‘SOS AMAZONIA’ Organizing and filming lasted almost and hour at the UFRA’s (Federal Rural University) main field. Technical assistance was provided by Amazon Watch, Rainforest Action Network, and Spectral Q.” (photo courtesy of Lou Dematteis/Spectral Q. ) As tribal leaderships around the world learn the legal and political protocols required to navigate their way through the various jurisdictions surrounding them, environmental and scientific communities are joining forces with them. Together, they are forming new alliances aimed at bringing global awareness to the plight of the very habitats that sustain the world. In this sense, the Amazon rainforest's health and survival are not only critical to the survival of the Indigenous people there, but to the entire planet as well. Sometimes referred to as the, “Lungs of our Planet," the rainforest ecosystem works by continuously recycling carbon dioxide into oxygen. Some estimates state that more than 20 percent of the world’s oxygen supplies comes from the Amazon Rainforest. With an estimated 10 million species of plants and one-fifth of the world's fresh water supply located in the Amazon Basin, protecting this area from destruction is not a local issue but a global issue of great concern. Echoing the call to action during the World Social Forum, Atossa Soltani, Executive Director, Amazon Watch stated, “It is urgent that the world act now to stop deforestation and to recognize the importance of the Amazon in stabilizing our climate. There needs to be an immediate halt to industrial resource extraction that is bringing the ecosystems and cultures of the Amazon to the brink of collapse.” Vast swathes of rainforest have been clear cut which data suggests is responsible for one fifth of the annual global carbon emissions, roughly equivalent to all the automobile emissions. Some 17 to 20 percent of the Amazon rainforest has been destroyed in the last 40 years, with another estimated 20 percent having been fragmented or degraded. New road construction, expansion of agriculture, and mining for resources such as oil, gas, and precious metals are only a portion of the impacts severely altering the face of the rainforest. Scientists are concerned that the Amazon forest will reach an irreversible ecological ‘tipping point’ that would forever change the ecosystem from rainforest to savannah. This event is estimated to release at least 76 gigatons of carbon, now stored in the forest ecosystems, into the atmosphere. Data suggests this amount is comparable to roughly 15 years worth of all human-caused emissions, and will exacerbate global climate change. Since 2000, South American governments have been discussing a framework for continent-wide infrastructure projects along nine geographic corridors, including the Amazon. Known as IIRSA, the Initiative for the Integration of Infrastructure in the South American Region, these projects number over 500 and carry a staggering price tag estimated at a minimum of $70 billion. Financing has come from a number of sources, multi-lateral institutions like the Inter-American Development Bank and the Andean Development Corporation that have been powerful influences on IIRSA. Questions arise about the cumulative impacts such enormous projects will have upon the sensitive Amazon regions. Proponents to the initiative have not adequately provided the answers to these critical issues. Estimates state that the full implementation of IIRSA would result in a 50% reduction in the Amazon rainforest by 2050. Indigenous communities, who are often those most effected by these projects, have not given consent nor been involved in the project planning for these massive developments. These enormous infrastructure projects bring the potential for escalated social conflicts across the regions, will apply negative impacts on Indigenous cultures and livelihoods, and accelerate deforestation. Without Indigenous community involvement, these impacts will likely continue and broaden in scope over time. Marco Apurina, Vice-Coordinator of COIAB, an indigenous umbrella organization, said in earlier press reports during the World Social Forum, “We are the guardians of the forest. This is a critical moment for Indigenous peoples to unite with non-Indigenous, activists, teachers, environmentalists, unions, government—the Amazon rainforest needs everyone to work together now to defend it before it’s too late.”

Monday, January 26, 2009

UNREPENTANT - unspoken canada, eh. Who in canada speaks of this? Who in canada speaks of over 50,000 Indigenous children who went to canada's Indian Residential Schools, and did not return home? Who in canada speaks of the thousands of unnamed Indigenous children of Kanata, (Gana-da ... "our village") are buried in unmarked graves at former residential schools? unnamed! Who in canada speaks of the families who still wait for notification of the fate of these children, the 'lost ones', their siblings, aunts ...? Who speaks of these families ... today? They are still here. Still waiting for respects from the Canadian people, for the lost children. UNREPENTANT!! Canada's governments - every one since 1867 - unrepentant of failure to uphold the Constitution(s) of the land now known as Canada (1763, 1867, 1982), and related peace treaties. UNREPENTANT!! Canada's large churches, Anglican, Catholic, United - since well before Confederation - unrepentant of 'conversion of heathens', that which we now know as genocide. Genocide - killing a culture - for 'moral' reasons among the ordinary faithful servants of the church machine, converting Indigenous Peoples of Kanata to their 'true' faith. Delusions of superiority, the cause of all human genocides, under the auspices of 'the Crown'. But less philosophy than sheer greed ... genocide for land by the church machine, for the Crown. Land 'in trust' for the Indigenous communities and for their children who were also taken 'in trust', since well before Confederation of Canada, and many didn't come back. The ugly pattern was set before Canada began. Canada joined in, took over responsibility, kept very few records they say, and none of individual children ... they say. (Who is accountable for the individual children?) They say they only have the total enrollment per year, used to distribute per diem funding to the church residential schools, to look after the Indigenous children apprehended under threat or coercion of mandatory attendance, into the care of church havens for zealous pedophiles, sadists and well intentioned dupes, into their care and guardianship. These are the children we mourn. The children who did not survive the Indian Residential Schools, in Canada and before Canada, and always in physical care of the Anglican, Catholic and United church machines. And we note Canada's governments' ongoing complicity with the church triumvirate in trying to cover up their intentions, past and present, with respect to Indigenous lands. And we note the 2008 Supreme Court end of legal violence from Canada against Indigenous Peoples asserting their rights on the land. [48] Where a requested injunction is intended to create “a protest-free zone” for contentious private activity that affects asserted aboriginal or treaty rights, the court must be very careful to ensure that, in the context of the dispute before it, the Crown has fully and faithfully discharged its duty to consult with the affected First Nations: see Julia E. Lawn, “The John Doe Injunction in Mass Protest Cases” (1998) 56 U.T. Fac. L. Rev. 101. The court must further be satisfied that every effort has been exhausted to obtain a negotiated or legislated solution to the dispute before it. Good faith on both sides is required in this process: Haida Nation, p. 532. http://www.ontariocourts.on.ca/decisions/2008/july/2008ONCA0534.pdf Governments ... all three levels ... and private companies ... all must consult, and must accommodate Aboriginal land rights before the project is approved. No more 'legal' violence. The 'land in trust' is not ours to develop. The children in our trust are in their graves. Unrepentant: Canada's Genocide

Saturday, January 24, 2009

Naming the Names:Kevin Annett-Fired by United Church
Fourteen Years Later, I'm Still Here, and So Are We
by Kevin D. Annett
I was fired from my job as a United Church minister in Port Alberni fourteen years ago today, by a weasly little bureaucrat named Art Anderson. Art's action ended my livelihood, marriage, and employability, and at the time, he must have figured that he had won. But I don't think Art could have grasped what a favor he was doing me, and thousands of native people who somehow survived the tortures and murder his church inflicted on them at so young an age. This is a thank you to Art Anderson, and to all the other mean spirited church gnomes who did their unwitting job of exposing their crime of genocide for all the world to see. They know who they are, but hell, let's name them all, since this is the time to start naming names: Foster Freed and Phil Spencer, my friends and fellow ministers, who went through seminary with me and often came to my home for dinner, and who then worked behind my back to have me secretly "investigated" by a special church court set up by a few officials in the Comox-Nanaimo Presbytery; Oliver Howard, senior United Church minister and former skipper on the church mission boat Thomas Crosby, who knew of the Alberni residential school murders, the grisly experiments at the Nanaimo Indian Hospital, and local pedophile rings, and who made the motion in the Presbytery Executive to have me dismissed after I spoke of the Alberni murders from my pulpit; Bob Stiven, Cameron Reid, and Colin Forbes, Presbytery officials, who kept the decision to fire and defrock me completely hidden from the wider Presbytery, and who authorized their illegal act; Brian Thorpe, top B.C. Conference executive officer, who encouraged and worked with my ex-wife, Anne McNamee, in her divorce proceedings against me after I was fired; Jon Jessiman and Iain Benson, church lawyers, who planned and executed my firing without cause and my defrocking without due process, pocketing over $150,000 in the process, Phil Spencer (again), who arranged to have the church pay Anne for her divorce costs, exceeding $35,000, and who engineered an extensive smear campaign against me; Fred Bishop, Anne Gray and Wendy Barker, my parishioners, who worked with the Presbytery clique to fire me without cause and blacken my name in Port Alberni; Bill Howie, local church official and associate of accused murderer Alberni residential school Principal Alfred Caldwell, who advised and encouraged Presbytery in its actions; John Cashore, United Church clergyman and provincial government minister in 1995, who instigated my firing after I publicly challenged his government and church's involvement in the theft of ancestral land of the Ahousaht nation on Flores Island, and Dozens of church officials, policemen and lawyers who cooperated in this criminal conspiracy to destroy my life and conceal murder and other crimes by the United Church of Canada. Thank you, all. It's thanks to you, after all, that I began learning about your church's secret crimes from the residential school survivors. It's thanks to you that I learned that 50,000 children had died under Christian care. It's thanks to you that I wrote the book Hidden from History: The Canadian Holocaust, and produced the film UNREPENTANT. And it's thanks to you that your church has been exposed as an agent of genocide, dragged into court by survivors, and started down a long road to oblivion. Just imagine if you had have done the decent thing, and not tried to stamp me out of existence? Think of all the money you would have saved, all the reporters you could have avoided! How much of your wrongdoing would still remain concealed; how little of the real crime would now be known. Of course, being part of that crime and its legacy, how could you have done the decent thing? But be that as it may, I'm curious, guys: was it some unconscious death wish that drove you to try to do me in? Did you know that I would not cave in and crawl away and die somewhere, as you hoped - according to Phil Spencer, at least, who claimed that I would do so? Did you really think I would stay silent, and worry more about myself than all those murdered kids? Or did you know that I was different than all of you? Maybe you were all just plain stupid. I prefer the latter explanation. There was such little intelligence in your actions, after all. And such tactlessness. I mean, how much finesse was present when, the night after I was fired, Phil Spencer (again) called me up at my home to gloat, and explode at my mother over the phone, "Kevin had this coming to him! So go ahead! Go ahead and try to sue us!" It's true, poor Phil had been drinking again, that night. But you'd think church bureaucrats would get, I don't know, some kind of legal advice now and then? Or communication skills training? The truth is, when one chooses to professionally belong to an organization like the Christian church that's founded on an immense historical duplicity, and whose closets are crammed full of skeletons and dirty secrets, then you learn pretty quickly that there's only one virtue that's rewarded: loyalty to a Big Lie. But that kind of loyalty needs to be tested regularly, which means that church clergy are expected to make a whore out of their own conscience and humanity in order to secure their pension, and rise through the hierarchy. Foster Freed and Phil Spencer won their reward for their foul betrayal of the truth, and of a friend. Foster subsequently became President of the B.C. Conference of the United Church, and Phil, somehow, got to be President of Presbytery. They proved themselves, through their capacity to serve the Lie. That's why I'm still here, and they aren't. Even more generally, that's why the residential school survivors are still here, and the United Church is crumbling. For whoever serves the Lie will be destroyed by it, regardless of their money or professional slickness or public legitimacy. And whoever stands simply on the truth will be raised by it, past every torture the Lie and its servants can inflict on them. That's some of what I've learned, on the ground, in fourteen years. It's more than a lesson, though: it's that pearl that Jesus used to mention, the thing that's worth losing everything else to win. We survivors of church torture have been given this gift, that special something that the religious experts and professional liars will never have. So why, in Jesus' name, do we still look to them for accountability, or "healing", or justice? Do we really expect the dead to be human? When will we finally accept the lesson of our own agony, won over so many long nights and after so much loss and sacrifice? When will we leave the dead to bury their dead, and walk into the land of the living? The government and churches of Canada, and the tottering culture they represent, can do nothing but commit the same crimes, over and over, all the time pretending they are not. We will win justice and a new life quite apart from them, once we have exposed them for the Big Lie they are, and walked away from them. Fifty Thousand children can't be wrong. January 23, 2009 Squamish Nation territory ................................................................................................. Kevin Annett 260 Kennedy St. Nanaim, B.C. Canada V9R 2H8 250-753-3345 www.hiddenfromhistory.org email: hiddenfromhistory@yahoo.ca

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Kingspan sues City of Brantford for $10m due to Six Nations land claim Aha! Brantford's day of reckoning ... at least one of them! Another is going on in court right now, tomorrow, FRIDAY, 10 am, Brantford Superior Court, as the City is still trying to get a permanent injunction on the Kingspan site, and others that developers have already pulled out of. hahaha! Company sues city for $10 milllion Brantford Expositor - Brantford,Canada ... which started to build its North American headquarters in Brantford, ... problem of Six Nations protesters contesting the property as aboriginal land. ...
And then ... (boy, Brantford is having a baaaad day!) Residential development on Conklin Road targeted
Posted 5 hours ago

Tempers flared as 15 to 20 native protesters halted work at the Empire Homes residential project on Conklin Road Thursday morning.

Construction workers yelled at the protesters as police tried to form a line between the two groups. About 50 to 60 Empire workers left the site, said one protester. “They’re not supposed to be digging here,” said Gene Johns. “This is the third time we’ve been here and they won’t listen.” Johns said he represents the Confederacy, the Six Nations community.

Sunday, January 18, 2009

APOLOGY DEMANDED FOR US NATIVE BOARDING SCHOOLS A recent editorial by Native journalist Tim Giago presents his viewpoints about the need for the story to be told about widespread abuses at early US Indian boarding schools and to call for a national apology:
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/337/story/59583.html
In addition, there are several movies/documentaries just released or slated to be released about the boarding school experience, including the new Wes Studi movie, "The Only Good Indian" (http://www.theonlygoodindian.com ) to be shown this weekend during the Sundance Film Festival in Utah.
The Elders also say the time is right for a collective healing from the trauma of the schools. This year, White Bison is hosting its fifth Sacred Hoop journey, the Wellbriety Journey for Forgiveness (formerly The Way Home Tour), to promote awareness of and healing from the historical trauma carried home from US Indian boarding schools.
The 40-day, 6,800-mile Journey begins May 16, 2009, at Chemawa Indian School in May 16 at the present-day Chemewa Indian School in Salem, Ore., and ends at the site of first Indian school at Carlisle, Penn., established in 1879.
At the conclusion of the Journey, a petition will be presented in Washington D.C. calling upon the President of the United States to formally apologize for abuses at the schools. Please visit www.wellbrietyjourney.org to sign the petition, find out how you can help and learn general information about the journey.
Please join White Bison in support of a collective healing from the historical trauma of the Indian boarding schools.

Commentary: 'Cultural Genocide' in the Land of the Free
It would appear to me that most Americans know more about the "Stolen Generation" of Aboriginal children in Australia than they do about the "Stolen Generations" of Indian children in their own country.

Why is that? Well, movies such as "Rabbit-proof Fence" and the newly released film "Australia" probably have something to do with it. In "Rabbit-proof Fence," two little aboriginal girls are taken from their homes to the Catholic mission boarding school without the consent of their parents. They run away from the school and follow the path of the rabbit-proof fence hundreds of miles knowing that the fence runs next to their land and will lead them home. The fence was designed to contain the proliferation of rabbits that had begun to overrun Australia.

The movie "Australia" contains some key roles for the aboriginal people. The main focus is on a small boy who barely escapes the hands of the police early on in the movie only to be captured in the end and sent to the island mission school that is designed to "breed the black" out of the aboriginal children.

It wasn't until 1973 that the practice of taking aboriginal children and placing them in mission boarding schools was prohibited by law in Australia. There has never been a law passed in America to end the same practice. In the 1960s the government-backed practice of taking Indian children from their parents and placing them in Bureau of Indian Affairs and Christian missionary boarding schools began to end of its own volition.

In Australia and in America the children were taken from their parents and their homelands to "breed the black out of them" and in America they were taken to "breed the Indian out of them." The saying popular in the hierarchy of the Catholic Church and in other denominations, as well as in the halls of Congress, was "Kill the Indian, Save the Child."

This practice, though well-intended by those implementing it, did more damage to the American Indian children than any other. What started out as a practice to convert the children to a new religion and a new perspective turned out to be nothing more than "cultural genocide."

An abundance of lawsuits against the Catholic and Anglican churches resulting in victories for indigenous complainants in Canada and Alaska have received little or no attention in America.

A recent lawsuit against the Catholic Church by former students of the St. Francis Indian School on the Rosebud Indian Reservation is now in the courts. There are statutes in South Dakota that would consider a statute of limitations and also consider allegations other than sexual abuse as non-essential. If "cultural genocide" could be included in the number of reasons for the lawsuits in South Dakota, it would put an entirely new face on the process. Though many former students still sport the scars of the sexual, physical and psychological abuse of the Indian boarding schools, the attempts to destroy their cultural beliefs is just as damaging and just as significant. The collateral damage of "cultural genocide" is one of the intangibles that are not easily interpreted in a court of law. It has taken nearly a generation for the former students of the Indian boarding schools to finally step forward and openly speak of their sexual abuse. It is not in the culture, the very culture that the boarding schools attempted to erase, for these Indian people to do so.

But after two or three generations, they are, at last, stepping forward and sadly, their courageous stand is drawing criticism from many of their own "converted" people. These are the converts that went through their entire boarding school experience apparently wearing blinders because they failed to see the abuse, whether it was physical, psychological, sexual or cultural that was taking place all around them.

These converts are as much a part of the cover-up as are the movie producers in Hollywood that find these true-to-life situations of cultural genocide too powerful and embarrassing for the consumption of the general population of Americans.

If Australia can finally stomach these epic wrongs against the aboriginal people of its continent and actually produce films depicting these evils, one can only ask the question: Where are those American film producers with the same courage? And if the government of Australia can issue an official apology to its aborigine citizens for the evil it rained upon them, why can't the America government do likewise? What is needed is an American Indian Spike Lee or a David Wolper to tell America "the rest of the story."

ABOUT THE WRITER

Tim Giago, an Oglala Lakota, is the founder and first president of the Native American Journalists Association. He can be reached at najournalist@msn.com or by writing to him at P.O. Box 1680, Rapid City, S.D. 57709. His new book, "Children Left Behind," is available at harmon@clearlightbooks.com.

© 2009, Tim Giago

Saturday, January 17, 2009

Rampant sexual abuse of native children in residential schools

OTTAWA — Thousands of native children suffered sexual abuse in Indian residential schools, newly disclosed figures show - a human tragedy so pervasive it's being called "monstrous."

The federal government has quietly paid out more than $350 million in abuse settlements over the last decade, the majority for sexual abuse, to 7,011 former students.

Several thousand more claims for sexual abuse at the hands of church and school officials have been filed over the last year under a 2006 agreement to compensate surviving students, the government and victims' lawyers say.

Both sides predict about 12,000 fresh compensation claims in total will be filed under the agreement - and that the "vast majority" will be for child sexual abuse.

All told, the figures suggest that at least one of every five students suffered sexual abuse at the schools, established in the 19th century to assimilate First Nations children and strip them of their aboriginal culture and language.

"It's horrible, it's monstrous," said Michael Cachagee, executive director and former president of a national group that helps former students.

Liberal MP Todd Russell, an aboriginal, said the numbers were shocking.

"In meeting residential school survivors, I mean across the country, I am not surprised at the percentage - but when you say it as a number, that is astounding."

Russell said he's heard many accounts of sexual abuse in discussions as a member of the Anglican Council of Indigenous People.

The high rate of sexual abuse suggests the isolated schools, which paid teachers and other staff poorly and failed to screen them properly, likely attracted pedophiles who saw the dismal institutions as a "gold mine," said one lawyer involved in past litigation on behalf of students.

Court evidence in lawsuits by former students suggests the churches that ran the schools on behalf of Ottawa may have transferred sex offenders to different locations to protect them and to prevent word leaking out about the extent of sexual abuse, the lawyer said.

Another lawyer, lead counsel in court proceedings that led to judicial approval of the 2006 compensation agreement, agreed.

"You've got an extremely vulnerable group of children who are isolated from their parents, who are dehumanized, who have no one to turn to, and they're in remote locations and you've got sub-par teachers," said Kirk Baert of Toronto.

"What better recipe could you have for exploitation than that? It's like a checklist of all the things you would need to have it happen a lot."

Baert also agreed the schools actively suppressed evidence of the abuse.

"They used various forms of intimidation to silence anyone who complained."

The federal government began negotiating the 2006 deal in May 2005 after facing a class-action lawsuit on behalf of roughly 80,000 surviving students claiming a total of $36 billion in damages.

Under the agreement, Ottawa will pay up to $1.9 billion to former students as compensation for simply being forced to attend the schools, separate from the abuse claims.

"They are expecting there to be 10,000 to 12,000, roughly, sexual-abuse claimants paid at the end of the day, so they are big numbers," said lawyer Darcy Merkur, who compiled a historical affidavit for legal work and fees for a consortium of 19 law firms in the class action.

James Ward, a Justice Department lawyer acting as general counsel for an Indian Affairs branch that was responsible for the issue, agreed "the majority" of the new claims are expected to be for sexual abuse.

Of the 7,011 claims in the first wave, 2,369 of 3,799 settled under a dispute resolution process the government established in 2003 involved sexual abuse, a spokesperson for the Indian Affairs Department said.

And virtually all 3,097 settled prior to that through litigation involved sexual abuse, says a lawyer who took part in the lawsuits. Time limits to sue for physical assault are more restrictive.

Another 133 claims settled so far under the new agreement involved sexual abuse, said the spokesperson, Patricia Valladao.

Of 33 affidavits from former male and female students sworn as part of the proceedings that led to the court approval of the 2006 agreement, 25 included claims of sexual abuse.

The grand chief of the Assembly of First Nations, Phil Fontaine, said aboriginal negotiators and leaders expected a high number of sexual abuse claims under the settlement agreement.

"Don't forget that the initial claims that precipitated all of this were for sexual abuse," said Fontaine. "We anticipated this would be like opening the floodgates."

The Liberal government of the day issued a reconciliation statement following a scathing report in 1996 from a royal commission on aboriginal peoples, which included a chapter on residential schools.

The reconciliation statement included an official apology to residential school survivors, followed by Prime Minister Stephen Harper's statement of apology on behalf of Canada in Parliament last June.

A spokesman for the United Church said it has been named in 1,100 claims, but he said the church had not done a "statistical analysis" to tabulate the number of claims for sexual abuse.

A spokesperson for the Roman Catholic church could not be reached and the Anglican Church of Canada did not respond to a request for an interview.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5iFN3rXAvyCwm4-7xpnw4qh8C_Bbw

Petition asks for inquiry into Fantino and OPP

Posted By KAREN BEST, CHRONICLE STAFF WRITER

Posted 17 hours ago

On Wednesday afternoon, a man came into The Chronicle office to sign a petition that asks for an inquiry into the actions and decisions of OPP Commissioner Julian Fantino and into the OPP actions in Caledonia over the past three years.

His signature will be one of 10,000 collected by April when the petition will be taken to the Ontario legislature.

Launched last week by Caledonia residents Dave Brown and Ken Hewitt, the petition had about 2,500 supporters by Jan. 14. Through the petition, they are asking for an immediate and unpaid suspension for Fantino while the inquiry into his actions is underway.

In the petition's background statement, organizers said police violations of the Criminal Code and the Police Services Act have been documented. They also say the people of Ontario have the right to know the true costs of policing in Caledonia.

Anyone who has signed the petition on the internet will have to sign a hard copy which is the legally accepted document to have their voices heard. Copies are available at The Chronicle office and at the Dunnville Chamber of Commerce office. If the petition is not available at the chamber's front desk, people are encouraged to ask as it may be in Haldimand Norfolk MPP Toby Barrett's office.

This week Brown delivered copies to stores and restaurants in Cayuga, Hagersville, Jarvis and Dunnville.

Hewitt said he had requests for copies from Ottawa, Barrie, London, Thorold, Niagara Falls, Toronto and Hamilton.

"It's exploding," said Brown. "I can't believe how powerful it's getting...It's overwhelming the amount of people who support this."

"We just need law enforcement," he added.

To pack the biggest wallop with politicians and media, Hewitt planned to deliver the petition to Queens Park during the week of April 12. He wanted 1,000 people to come with him. Progressive Conservative leader John Tory will sign the petition before presenting it in the legislature, he added.

Anticipating a large gathering, Hewitt said the timing will coincide with the third anniversary of the April 20 OPP raid on Douglas Creek Estates.

In February 2006, several persons from Six Nations moved into the subdivision construction site claiming it as part of their people's territory. The Caledonia property is within the Haldimand Tract that extends six miles from both sides of the Grand River. Granted in 1784 to Six Nations by Sir Frederick Haldimand, the land replaced territory lost when they fought with the British in the American War of Independence.

What threw Hewitt over the edge was Fantino's endorsement of Clyde Powless, a Six Nations resident. He faced mischief charges for allegedly pulling a hydro tower across Argyle Street South on Dec. 1 during a smoke shop protest. In his letter, Fantino said Powless has acted as a negotiator and a go-between for his people and OPP.

Reporters and politicians have seen Powless acting in that capacity at a few incidents over the past three years.

Fantino crossed the line in submitting that letter of support and is no longer unbiased or neutral, said Hewitt.

"I think he needs to go," said Dunnville resident Dennis James. "We need someone who can abide by the rules...Breaking the law is breaking the law no matter what race you are."

He believed political influence was the biggest problem in the immediate area.

Hamilton police officer David Hartless signed the petition as did other officers including some OPP members, he said. Eager to see an inquiry into what was really going on, the Caledonia resident will ask more officers and friends to sign.

This is being done professionally without blocking any roads or burning not even one tire, said Hartless. Ultimately an inquiry will make sure no one else has to endure what Caledonia residents have, he pointed out.

OPP are following flawed recommendations from the Ipperwash Inquiry, stated Hewitt. Five years ago, Premier Dalton McGuinty ordered the inquiry to look into the death of Dudley George and to determine how to avoid a fatality can be prevented in future land claim disputes.

In Sept. 1995, George was one of the natives who moved into the Ipperwash Provincial Park. In a confrontation between protesters and police, a shot was fired and mortally wounded him.

"It will bring a lot of things out in the open," said James of a Caledonia inquiry. "This is going to open up coast to coast."

Failure is not an option according to South Cayuga resident Donna Pitcher. "We will be relentless with this...and we will accept nothing but an inquiry being done," she said.

Barrett signed the petition. An attempt to confirm reports that MP Diane Finley only signed for the OPP inquiry was not successful. Her communication director Julie Vaux replied by email saying policing is a provincial matter.

"What I can say is that Minister Finley supports her constituents and shares their frustrations as we approach the third anniversary of the Caledonia occupation," stated Vaux.

Calling from an agricultural meeting in Canfield, Barrett said he suggested that Hewitt bring the petition to his New Year levee on Jan. 11 in Caledonia. The MPP only signed in support of the public inquiry into OPP actions.

As a publicly elected servant, he said he could not stick his nose into court issues so he did not sign for the Fantino inquiry.

In June 2006, Tory formally tabled a call for an inquiry and it was passed in the legislature but no action has been taken on it. Now Barrett was in full support of this new campaign for an inquiry as it will reveal solid factual evidence and hopefully will come up with a better approach to dealing with land claims.

Barrett gave petition organizers credit for their responsible approach in seeking answers. This conscious effort also takes off the pressure as the third anniversary of Feb. 28 is looming, he added.

After the petition was launched, Gary McHale who founded the Caledonia Wake Up Call web site challenged Haldimand County council members to show their support for residents by signing the petition. Councillors Craig Grice, Buck Sloat and Leroy Bartlett did. Mayor Marie Trainer did not.

Even though she agreed with an inquiry, she felt she could not sign since she had testified about two-tier policing in McHale's bail condition hearings. She is also a member of the county's police services board and soon council will be asked to enter into another contract with OPP.

"I thought it just wasn't appropriate (to sign for an inquiry into Fantino)," said Trainer. "He might think I was picking on him."

The mayor hoped the general inquiry will look into the handling of the entire situation, the change in OPP policing on Sixth Line and damage to and blockage of county roads.

Caledonia's councillor Craig Grice, who signed for both questions, said an inquiry was needed so residents can regain power over their daily life. This petition is a quiet form of protest without commotion on the streets, he added

"Every time a skirmish happens, OPP say the peace was kept but the peace should not have broken down," he said.

As a result, many Caledonia residents no longer have respect for OPP, he added.

Some people have asked him to bring them a copy of the petition to sign. "There are a lot of residents who are afraid to sign the petition (in a public place) for fear of repercussions," said Grice who will not vote in favour of a new OPP contract.

According to Pitcher, the petition holds a lot of weight for people because it was launched by county residents. In the same way people rallied in opposition of the proposed sale of Haldimand County Hydro, people are putting their differences aside to work for the common goal of an inquiry, she added.

When $100 million in taxpayers' money is spent as it has been in Haldimand County, an inquiry should automatically be done, said Pitcher of making the government accountable.

Mary Lou LaPratte said an inquiry was essential because the situation in Caledonia has gone beyond the bounds of ethics and beyond Fantino. She hoped the inquiry will be successful with all interested parties allowed to testify. This inquiry will not be about how someone was killed but will be about the actual actions of police and their failure to follow the Police Services Act, she pointed out.

"There is a real scandal about to unfold," said LaPratte.

Two tier justice started in 1992 in her community, West Ipperwash and 17 years later it continues in some ways, said LaPratte who has moved to another community. Race-based policing was adopted more widely after the inquiry and resulted in decreased protection from extremists, she p>At an informal session with the Ipperwash inquiry commissioner, residents voiced their concerns and provided recommendations on how to better take non-native interests into consideration during land claim disputes. None were added into the final report, said LaPratte.

Also disturbing was the OPP's approach of arresting people to prevent them from getting hurt by extremists, said LaPratte. This is comparable to a dictatorship in a Third World country, she added.

At least one supporter of Six Nations has signed the petition. Hamilton resident Connie Kidd only agreed to an inquiry into the actions and decisions of the OPP.

This will be a follow up on how the OPP are implementing Ipperwash Inquiry recommendations and if they are doing it right and if it worked, she added.

The findings would be very useful as a public information item for Canada, said Kidd. She also expected the inquiry would address laws and court precedents requiring government to consult and accommodate First Nations when their rights or lands were affected.

Kidd said the local dispute is the result of government failure to consult and accommodate Six Nations prior to development.

Michael Corrado, who is completing a residential development in Cayuga, said Haldimand County is no further ahead on the land dispute than three years ago. Now provincial taxpayers are facing tens of millions of dollars in expenses for policing, negotiator wages and court hearings.

He pointed out that this bill continues to grow when every tax dollar counts and the province is considering cutting social programs and going into deficit spending. The extraordinary costs for OPP is staggering, he noted.

"The residents of Haldimand County have taken the direct hit but so have the taxpayers of Ontario," added Corrado, who has not signed the petition.

Article ID# 1390271

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Gaza Strip same size as Montreal: Canada condones human rights violations Toronto, January 12, 2009 The United Nations Human Rights Council condemned Israel on Monday for its grave violations of human rights in Gaza. The resolution called for an international mission to be dispatched to Gaza. Canada was the only country to vote against the resolution with 33 others countries voting in favour and 13 abstaining. Canada voted against the resolution which called for an immediate withdrawal of Israeli troops from the Gaza strip because it felt it did not make clear that Israel had attacked in response to rockets launched from Gaza into Southern Israel. However the resolution did specify that the launching of the crude rockets against Israeli civilians that resulted in the loss of 4 civilian lives should end, while noting that more than 900 Palestinian had been killed and 4,000 injured as a result of Israel's strikes. Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CJPME) finds that Canada's position during the War on Gaza has been wholly unsatisfactory and that Canada is complicit in the Gaza massacres by its failure to call for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire and to hold Israel responsible for its illegal actions in the Strip. The Canadian 'No' vote comes as no surprise considering Canada's recent record of voting at the UN concerning Israel, said CJPME Director, Thomas Woodley. Canada has become one of just a few countries in the world to blindly support Israel regardless of its violations of international law. Canada does this despite the consensus in the international community to condemn Israel for its continued occupation and contraventions of international law. In the last four years the Canadian vote at the UN regarding Israel has largely moved away from support for Palestinian human and humanitarian rights and self-determination. Canada has shifted from Yes votes to Abstentions and No votes, placing Canada firmly in the minority of the international community supporting of Israel and its brutal policies regarding the Occupied Palestinian Territories. CJPME believes that ending the occupation of both the West Bank and Gaza through a negotiated and just solution is the only means by which both peoples can hope to live in peace and with dignity.
About CJPME Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CJPME) is a non-profit and secular organization bringing together men and women of all backgrounds who labour to see justice and peace take root again in the Middle East. Its mission is to empower decision-makers to view all sides with fairness and to promote the equitable and sustainable development of the region. For more information, please contact Grace Batchoun, 514-745-8491. Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East http://ww.cjpme.org The whole or parts of this press release can be reproduced without permission. http://www.cjpme.org/DisplayDocument.aspx?DocumentID=289&SaveMode=0 Spotlight on Israeli carnage in Gaza

January 2009

Monday, January 12, 2009

Brantford Expositor:

SIX NATIONS LAND DISPUTE

Posted 11 hours ago
Regarding Jan. 2's well intentioned editorial, "An obvious resolution," there are a few very important words I hope that Expositor readers -- and that includes Brantford's mayor and council -- didn't just breeze over without giving much thought to. The editorial starts with a hope that Brantford and Six Nations "find a way to move forward together." The first thought to consider is the need to "find a way." That would strongly imply that the way we are now heading is not that way. "Forward" means different things to different world views. To some, it means paving over all available green space and growing into another Mississauga ASAP. To others, it means learning how to preserve, protect and care for what land there is left for future generations to enjoy. The next word is "together." That would imply that consultation, dialogue and mutual respect are going to be needed to find this new way. It would also imply that both parties would share equally in both the planning, the process and the proceeds. In the past, when Brantford has used words like partnering and sharing, what has been meant is rather: "get out of our way, go back to the reserve, and leave us alone." This more than 200-year-old pattern of policy is exactly what created the present situation both communities find ourselves in as 2009 unfolds. I will be watching very closely as the two dozen or so injunction related cases make their way through the Wellington Street courts this January and February. The legal bill, which we Brantford taxpayers will have to eat, is now over $250,000 and the real spending hasn't even begun. Brantford will not win this one either and every cent accumulated by lawyers representing not only Brantford but the Six Nations individuals facing contempt charges based on this bogus injunction strategy, plus all other related court costs, will come back to city hall and be passed on to you and me, and that will be in the millions. When that happens, many will blame those pesky Indians, but the real culprits are those at city hall who know they are driving this bus into a brick wall and are too damned arrogant to admit it. So, are the injunctions working, as the editor suggests? No, and not by a long shot! Drop these foolish injunctions now! Talk is much cheaper and far less damaging to all. Now that is the obvious resolution I see. Jim Windle Brantford

Fantino under fire for Caledonia dispute Petition calls for provincial probe
Posted 11 hours ago
A petition calling for an inquiry into OPP Commissioner Julian Fantino's handling of the Caledonia land dispute is gaining steam. The petition, drafted by residents Ken Hewitt and Dave Brown on Jan. 1, has more than 1,400 signatures and was signed Sunday by Conservative MPP Toby Barrett. Barrett said he will introduce the petition in the legislature once a goal of 10,000 signatures is reached from across the province. Brown says Human Resources Minister Diane Finley signed the petition at Barrett's levee in Caledonia Sunday. Finley could not be reached for comment. Local politicians including Haldimand County councillors Craig Grice, Leroy Bartlett, Buck Sloat and Mayor Marie Trainer have also signed the petition. The petition asks the province to look into the actions and decisions made by the province's top cop and if he's found to have acted unethically or with bias, to press him for immediate resignation. They also have created an online petition and a Facebook group, called "Petition for Julian Fantino Inquiry." Barrett, the MPP for Haldimand-Norfolk county, said his party called for an inquiry two and a half years ago. Barrett said the instances of physical violence in standoffs over land disputes, along with the emotional and economic toll on the residents of Caledonia are reasons why he supports the petition. He said the ongoing frustration residents feel is a result of what he calls "government paralysis" over the situation. Fantino could not be reached for comment.

Copyright © 2009 Brantford Expositor

© 2009 Brantford Expositor

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Oil sands admits PR failure

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090108.woilsands0108/BNStory/energy/?page=rss&id=RTGAM.20090108.woilsands0108 Canada's oilsands industry admits it has “dropped the ball” in engaging with the public about the environmental effects of its developments, the head of the sector's largest lobby group said Thursday in revealing the results of a major public outreach campaign. “I think that the ground has been taken away from us in many respects by campaigns by environmental groups and others,” Dave Collyer, president of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, told a news conference. Collyer was joined by Imperial Oil Ltd. (TSX:IMO) chief executive Bruce March and Oil Sands Developers Group president Don Thompson in announcing the findings of a CAPP poll. The industry has not been upfront enough, said Thompson, whose group communicates between companies, the government and local stakeholders about oilsands development. “We've allowed others to take the agenda from us,” he said. While the industry may have failed on the communications front, Collyer said he stands by the industry's environmental performance. “We've dropped the ball on getting our message out and communicating. We have not dropped the ball on environmental performance as an industry,” he said. The poll, which surveyed 425 people in both Edmonton and Toronto in June, sought to find out more about Canadians' perceptions of the oilsands industry, which has been encountering mounting criticism from environmentalists. The poll was done in conjunction with an online forum called Canada's Oil Sands: A Different Conversation, which garnered thousands of responses from the public. About 46 per cent of respondents believed oilsands companies have not done a good job in balancing the environment and the economy, while 22 per cent think the industry has achieved that balance. The industry's impact on fresh water supply was cited as the biggest area of concern, followed by the impact on wildlife and habitat. The industry garnered worldwide infamy early last year, when it was revealed that 500 ducks had died in a toxic tailings pond at Syncrude Canada Ltd.'s site near Fort McMurray, Alta. Many communities in the area are also concerned that companies are drawing too much fresh water from the Athabasca river, which is needed to separate the sticky bitumen from sand and clay. And there are worries toxic chemicals from the oilsands plants are finding their way into the food chain, jeopardizing the health of aboriginal communities downstream of the developments. Oilsands developments require a great deal of energy and emit large amounts of carbon dioxide, the gas attributed to climate change. The industry says it has made progress in reducing its water use and has been working on improving technology used in its tailings ponds. Many in the sector have backed carbon capture and sequestration technology as a means to prevent carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere by storing it underground. However, there has been debate over whether taxpayers or industry should foot the bill. Half of the respondents said they do not believe what oil and gas executives say in the media, compared with 13 per cent who do believe what they say. But the survey also said 63 per cent of respondents believe Canada benefits from oilsands development and 64 per cent said the oilsands are important to providing a secure supply of Canada's future oil needs. The poll, which was done by “academic researchers,” has a margin of error of 4.8 per cent, 19 times out of 20. Lindsay Telfer of the Sierra Club said the polling by CAPP reinforces the messages her environmental group has been trying to get out, but that she would like to see the industry and government move beyond “rhetoric.” “I think there are some very significant and very real concerns that Canadians have on how the oilsands have been proceeding and it's not just a perception issue,” she said. Greenpeace campaigner Mike Hudema said the world is turning away from Alberta's “dirty oil,” with the European Union and U.S. states recently imposing low-carbon fuel standards. “The markets have spoken, it's the industry that's not listening,” Hudema said. Collyer said the industry is also trying to spread its message south of the border, with President-Elect Barack Obama expected to take a tougher stance on greenhouse gas emissions than his predecessor, George W. Bush. “We'll be very active in Washington and in various states that influence policy in the U.S. over the next several months,” he said. Imperial's March added that oilsands companies produce energy that is desperately needed in the global economy, but that many people simply do not understand that dynamic. “It looks easy when you see the price of gasoline 40 feet in the air,” he said. “People count on this so much in their lives, but they simply don't understand how it gets done and they don't understand the complexity.” A private prosecution was launched Wednesday against Syncrude, in which Imperial holds a 25 per cent stake, over the duck deaths. The company has also fought environmentalists in court over its $8-billion Kearl oilsands development. March said he has no fear that future court battles will hinder Imperial's oilsands activities. “Frankly, that's a part of the business and the world we live in and I'd expect that to continue,” he said. (The Canadian Press)

Friday, January 09, 2009

Judge not biased not unfit: Fantino must face him in court Arbiter's reaction to lawyer no proof of bias against Fantino, court hears 7 hours ago TORONTO — An adjudicator had every reason to feel he was being threatened by an experienced lawyer acting for Ontario Provincial Police Commissioner Julian Fantino, and his reaction did not show he was biased, a court heard Thursday. Lawyer Julian Falconer, who represents two officers charged by Fantino with professional misconduct, told Divisional Court the adjudicator's reaction to being told he would be appealed if he didn't step down was perfectly understandable. "It is not in the least surprising," Falconer told the three-judge panel. "It was an extraordinary submission to make to an adjudicator. It was unnecessary. It was offensive." At issue is whether Leonard Montgomery is unfit to continue hearing the disciplinary case against the two senior officers, as Fantino contends. At the disciplinary hearing in October, Fantino's lawyer Brian Gover asked Montgomery to step down and said he would take the matter to court if the retired justice did not do so. Gover also insisted he had the full support of the province's attorney general - something the ministry immediately disavowed. An angry Montgomery refused to step down. Gover's comments, Montgomery said, amounted to a "highly improper" attempt to intimidate a judicial officer. He also complained about apparent political interference and conflicts of interest related to the Ministry of the Attorney General's involvement. In his submissions, Fantino's new lawyer Tom Curry told Divisional Court that Gover's comments were in response to pointed questions from the defence. It was an "unjustifiable attack" for Montgomery to accuse Gover, who was only being "candid," of intimidation, Curry said. At several points, Justice James Carnwath challenged Curry's assertion that Montgomery had shown bias rather than a normal reaction to Gover's announcement that he would go to court if not satisfied. "This kind of statement leads to some pretty harsh responses from the bench," Carnwath noted. "(Montgomery) was pretty constrained." Curry insisted the adjudicator had, on several occasions, shown hostility to the prosecution. He also complained Montgomery had unfairly called Fantino's credibility into question when the commissioner changed his testimony during the disciplinary hearing. Among other things, Montgomery had said he was "upset" by what had happened. Curry said the comments show the adjudicator had closed his mind to any "innocent explanation" for Fantino's change. "It is crystal clear the adjudicator has gone beyond permissible criticism, commentary and rulings," Curry said. Falconer said the recusal motion appeared designed to derail Fantino's cross-examination, and he urged the judges to let the disciplinary proceedings continue. The labyrinthine disciplinary hearing involves two former members of the provincial police internal standards bureau. They are accused under the Police Services Act in relation to an investigation they did into how officers responded to a domestic violence complaint involving an officer and his estranged wife more than four years ago. But the case has ensnared Fantino, with the defence accusing him of petty vindictiveness and witness tampering. The attorney general has also been forced to disavow Gover's assertion that it backed his request for Montgomery to recuse himself. http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5hNPH9O8hF6Id6IlEibLsJNRhj3fg This is friggen hilarious!
Gover also insisted he had the full support of the province's attorney general - something the ministry immediately disavowed.
Of course the Ministry would have to disavow. duh. What's wrong with Fantino's head? Fantino made his lawyer try to 'strong arm' the judge, using the name of the Attorney-General no less, and in court! I'm sure he is accustomed to doing in private with great success. That's how Fantino operates ... away from the light of justice. But Fantino's tactics don't work in court. hahahaha! Going down a peg or two, he is. Fantino implicated the Attorney General in 'fixing' a court. Prediction for 2009: Fantino is toast! NObody can keep Fantino in power if he hangs himself! ... like by ratting out the Attorney General on the public record. hahahahahahaha!

Wednesday, January 07, 2009

Strahl (Indian Affairs) must answer for Barriere Lake decision
http://www.ckrz.com/webpage%20news.pdf The Federal Court has green-lighted a legal challenge of Indian Affairs Minister Chuck Strahl's intervention in a nasty leadership dispute on a Quebec reserve. Judge Russel Zinn set aside Tuesday an earlier ruling that struck down an application to judicially review Strahl's exclusive support of a new chief at Barriere Lake. The tiny community about 300 kilometres north of Ottawa has drawn riot police to the scene of road blockades over leadership and forestry disputes stretching back more than a decade. At issue in this case is the decision by Strahl's department last Jan. 31 to recognize and “conduct its relationship” with Chief Casey Ratt and four councillors. Ratt is accused by his detractors of breaching the band's customary election code and deposing interim chief Benjamin Nottaway. Nottaway was recently sentenced to 45 days in jail for his role in related protests that blocked part of Highway 117 outside the impoverished reserve of about 450 people. Ratt has publicly dismissed the so-called leadership crisis as the sour grapes of failed leaders who are no longer in charge. He says he first agitated for a leadership review last year after Nottaway's backers shut down the band school. Ratt has accused his rivals of using local kids as pawns in a complex political battle with the province and Ottawa. It includes a protracted fight for a share of forestry and other resource revenues estimated to be worth $100 million a year on traditional Algonquin territory. Ratt's house burned down in a manner he describes as suspicious, and he has accused his opponents of trying to bully him off the reserve. His challengers, led by the elders council of Barriere Lake, now want a court review of Ottawa's support for his leadership. The Federal Court decision Tuesday paves the way. “In my view, it is open to the applicants to argue that (Strahl), when he decided that in dealing with (Barriere Lake) he would deal with the Ratt council, made or purported to make, a decision under the Indian Act” that is “reviewable,” Zinn ruled. The elders council and Indian Affairs “ought to be permitted to make full submissions to the court on all of the issues raised in the application,” he wrote. David Nahwegahbow, lawyer for the elders council, said the ruling is “quite a relief.” “The minister tried to say that basically they didn't make a decision, that all they did was sort of receive the (leadership) results and put them in the filing cabinet. That was pretty bogus. “What I thought was quite dangerous was that the minister made a decision as to who he would conduct his relationship with. And if you . . . analyze the implications of it, basically then the minister could decide who he wanted to deal with in terms of . . . setting up a treaty or making any kind of an agreement.” It was not immediately clear whether Strahl would appeal the Federal Court decision. “Because it's still before the courts it would be inappropriate to comment,” said Patricia Valladao, a spokeswoman for Indian Affairs. (The Canadian Press)

Six Nations, federal, negotiations resume Jan 28

Federal, provincial and Six Nations negotiators are all expected to be back at the table on Jan. 28 to resume land claims talks, Radio Station CKPC reports.

Talks broke off last June. Since then, Six Nations has rejected a multi-million dollar federal offer to settle a claim related to the development of the Welland Canal. A key part of this month's meeting will be the federal response to Six Nations' rejection of that offer. http://www.brantfordexpositor.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1377517
The feds offered $26m as the value of the flooded Welland Canal lands, scrawled on a piece of paper, slid across the table with no signature and without clear rationale. It is now Six Nations counter offer that is on the table, capped at $500m, with land, compensation for land, and compensation for 'loss of use' of Welland Canal all under discussion.

Tuesday, January 06, 2009

MP: "Israel must end Blockade" MP Storseth, Western Standard: "Israel must also end their Eighteen month long Blockade of Gaza." YES!!! http://westernstandard.blogs.com/shotgun/2009/01/a-voice-of-reason-on-gaza.html

And ...

Obama Breaks Silence, Vows To Work for Peace in Gaza

washingtonpost YES!!! If the Canadian government drags its feet, you miss the wave, you become the 'problem' to be buried with Bush. I'm not entirely opposed to that. But Canadian politics is anathema to me, and I'm much more concerned about the children and families of Gaza, and I will put pressure anywhere there is power to
DO THE RIGHT THING RIGHT NOW!!!
Just as your courageous MP Brian Storseth has done. Catch the wave. ck Aid Appeal - MP calls for Gaza ceasefire 6:43pm Click here to email Jeremy Lye 1/5/2009 It may be half a world away - but the conflict in Gaza hasn't gone unnoticed by one Local MP. Westlock-St. Paul MP Brian Storseth is echoing the federal government's call for Israel and Hamas to agree to an immediate ceasefire. But where the government says Hamas must first end their attacks on Israeli civillians, Storseth has gone one step beyond the Government's official line saying Israel must also end their Eighteen month long Blockade of Gaza. Unofficial estimates put the death toll from the incursion at over 500.
..... Posted by Janet Neilson on January 6, 2009 | Permalink Note: CBC ran a tidbit on Storseth, then pulled it. (chicken spits!)

Six Nations: Onus for peace lies with Brantford Onus for peace lies with the city BRANTFORD AND SIX NATIONS

Re: "An obvious resolution" (Brantford vs. Six Nations) http://www.brantfordexpositor.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1369685

Of course there's an obvious resolution. The number of attempts at an accommodating and respectful dialogue on the part of Six Nations council and, of late, the Confederacy council with Brantford Council, is unknown. Suffice to say, so many attempts were made that we have lost count. If, as the editorial suggests, there is a way, someone should make great haste and inform Brantford city council because we of Six Nations have been attempting that 'better way' for quite some time now.

Quoting from the Editorial;

1. "Native protesters should resolve to consider the impact of their actions on people who have no ability to settle the land claims fuelling their unhappiness."

2. "City council should resolve to pursue a more conciliatory approach with Six Nations."

Simply put. If City Council had complied with the law as handed down by the Supreme Court of Canada, and entered into meaningful consultation with Six Nations, quote NO. 1 would be rendered moot.

How many times does The Expositor feel Six Nations should be the one to hold out the olive branch to Brantford? Thirty times? Fifty times? One hundred times? How about 150 times (probably more) over the past 150 years?

Let me tell you this, the number of times Brantford has extended an olive branch to Six Nations can be counted on one hand. (Figuratively speaking of course). In reality, very, very few times by comparison.

We have always shown our respect toward Brantford council in our many, many peaceful submissions, delegations and presentations, which clearly showed Brantford of our willingness to work together ... only to be ignored. With regard to the intent of this editorial, I would respectfully but strongly suggest the onus lies with the city of Brantford if peace is to be achieved.

C. Orville Garlow Ohsweken

Monday, January 05, 2009

Questioning capitalism ... A series of links
Capitalism's growth imperative and societal engineering
By Richard K. Moore, Chapter 1, section f, of A Guidebook: How the world works and how we can change it (2000)

People of the same trade seldom meet together… but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the publick, or in some contrivance to raise prices.

Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations, 1776

Globalization is above all about capitalism, and about removing all constraints to the efficient operation of capitalist economics. The constraints which are being rapidly removed include not only tariff barriers and import quotas, but also environmental protections, anti-trust laws, health and safety regulations, and indeed the power of nations to plan or control their own economic destinies.

The reasoning behind all this, we are told, is about the creation of ‘free markets' that will enable the ‘most efficient’ operators to succeed—and thereby benefit everyone in the long run. The experience of the Robber Baron era, not to mention the condition of the world today, shows us that this reasoning is faulty. Let's look at the reasoning in a bit more detail to understand where it goes astray. ... http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/25/098.html

ECONOMICS AND ETHICS
The defense of value-neutrality still stands, but the pillars seem to be weakening. http://www.nd.edu/~cwilber/pub/recent/ethichbk.html
Economist jokes ...
http://netec.wustl.edu/JokEc.html Although ethics teaches that virtue is its own reward, in economics we get taught that reward is its own virtue. .....
True story: The scene is a conference of professors of marketing. The keynote speaker is an eminent economist. The chairman, who sees himself as a bit of a wag, says,

"I would like to introduce my eminent colleague and friend. He's an economist, one of those people who turn random numbers into mathematical laws." The economist, not to be outdone, replies, "My friend, here, is a marketer. They reverse the process." .....

When an economist says the evidence is "mixed," he or she means that theory says one thing and data says the opposite.
Well, I started this out seriously, and will continue ... but these jokes are illuminating too. That last one could also read ... When an politician says the evidence is "mixed," he or she means that party policy says one thing and evidence says the opposite. This is my fave from above link:
Heard at the Wharton School.

Man walking along a road in the countryside comes across a shepherd and a huge flock of sheep. Tells the shepherd, "I will bet you $100 against one of your sheep that I can tell you the exact number in this flock." The shepherd thinks it over; it's a big flock so he takes the bet. "973," says the man. The shepherd is astonished, because that is exactly right. Says "OK, I'm a man of my word, take an animal." Man picks one up and begins to walk away.

"Wait," cries the shepherd, "Let me have a chance to get even. Double or nothing that I can guess your exact occupation." Man says sure. "You are an economist for a government think tank," says the shepherd. "Amazing!" responds the man, "You are exactly right! But tell me, how did you deduce that?" "Well," says the shepherd, "put down my dog and I will tell you."

Laughing But I digress ...
Ipperwash, official racism and the future of Ontario http://www.dominionpaper.ca/articles/2040

Fantino also urged Brant to “pull the plug” on the blockades or “suffer grave consequences." At a news conference, Rosenthal said Fantino threatened Brant "with premature death at the hands of [an OPP] sniper."

Rosenthal warned, “If somebody does read that transcript, who’s aware of Ipperwash, they would recognize that there's danger in allowing Fantino to be head of OPP and the danger we talk about is life and death.”

What Obama says about energy supplies ... Dion already said!

"In a few weeks, when Obama's new energy plan is revealed, it will likely include some very damaging information regarding fossil fuel reserves.
http://www.angelnexus.com/o/web/10434

On November 12, 2008, the International Energy Agency (IEA) released its World Energy Outlook.

This is the world's most authoritative source of global energy trends that provides energy projections to 2030.

In this report, the IEA stated in very clear terms that renewable energy will soon become the second largest source of electricity.

Why?

Because the day that report came out, the IEA officially confirmed that every fossil fuel resource we rely on today will simply not be able to keep pace with demand.

That's right. Every fossil fuel resource.

And there's plenty of objective, peer-reviewed data to back up the IEA's findings too.

Gee ... it looks like the much maligned Stephane Dion was right!

Sunday, January 04, 2009

Six Nations, Brantford: Court date Wed Jan 7
On wednesday the 7th Dick Hill (Six Nations) will be in court in brantford over the illegal injunction (City of Brantford) using a constitutional defense!
Most recent relevant constitutional ruling:
[48] Where a requested injunction is intended to create “a protest-free zone” for contentious private activity that affects asserted aboriginal or treaty rights, the court must be very careful to ensure that, in the context of the dispute before it, the Crown has fully and faithfully discharged its duty to consult with the affected First Nations: see Julia E. Lawn, “The John Doe Injunction in Mass Protest Cases” (1998) 56 U.T. Fac. L. Rev. 101. The court must further be satisfied that every effort has been exhausted to obtain a negotiated or legislated solution to the dispute before it. Good faith on both sides is required in this process: Haida Nation, p. 532.

Saturday, January 03, 2009

Brantford should thank Six Nations:

City council's legal action to blame for trouble

I think Brantford should get on its knees and thank the people from Six Nations that something far worse hasn't occurred. ... in the face of repeated attempts on Brantford's part to suppress the inalienable rights of the sovereign people of Six Nations with racist bylaws and injunctions which are doomed to failure.

Re: Tim Philp's column "What a difference a year makes." http://www.brantfordexpositor.ca/PrintArticle.aspx?e=1365253

Philp states: "While native activists may have taken some delight in having caused developers to stop work ... etc."

This is small-minded commentary. Nothing could be further from the truth. Philp makes it sound as if we are gloating, gleeful or deriving some sort of smug satisfaction out of our few successes in stopping development in Brantford. I would prefer something like: "Enjoying the fruits of our honest efforts."

The operative word here is honest. This is a word many of Brantford's citizens have come to know as a characteristic its own council is unaware of. We didn't skulk under cover of darkness creating havoc. We did not cover our faces. We conducted our responsibilities in the open, in broad daylight for all to see. We suffered as many racial slurs from the "good citizens" of Brantford as the mind can conceive and, for the most, maintained our dignity.

The greater majority of we "activists" -- and here I prefer the word "protectors" -- have stood the line in every kind of inclement weather and there's no delight in that, I can assure you. We have stood peacefully with open hands and open faces, but came armed only with a deep sense of purpose and determination; a knowing of what constitutes right and the will to prevent great injustices being perpetrated against both the land we are responsible for and ourselves as a people.

When Philp speaks of the financial woes facing Brantford, alluding to "native activists" as being largely responsible for them and delighting in those woes, he is nowhere near the bull's-eye. Brantford's present mayor and council are where the majority of blame lies.

It has used and perverted the legal system. It has refused time and again to recognize its legal obligation, its responsibilities and duty to consult with Six Nations in a meaningful way, as ruled by many courts in Canada in various actions involving natives, including the Supreme Court of Canada!

And the whole point is: none of this would have happened if Brantford had offered up a modicum of respect toward Six Nations and its interests in the Haldimand Tract as a federally acknowledged land claim. In fact, Brantford followed the same path that Caledonia took in 2006, knowing in advance it couldn't work. I think Brantford should get on its knees and thank the people from Six Nations that something far worse hasn't occurred.

The good minds of Brantford's neighbours across the river have prevailed and kept the peace in the face of repeated attempts on Brantford's part to suppress the inalienable rights of the sovereign people of Six Nations with racist bylaws and injunctions which are doomed to failure.

If Philp is so worried about local tax dollars, ask the mayor and council to account for the tens of thousands of dollars frittered away on legal actions against Six Nations which have virtually no chance of success. Talking in a meaningful, respectful way with Six Nations would have been a lot cheaper, more productive and prevented a lot of hard feelings.

C. Orville Garlow

Ohsweken

Canada denies American request in prosecuting Ontario protestors

Jordana Huber, Canwest New Service Published: Friday, January 02, 2009

http://www.nationalpost.com/news/canada/story.html?id=1135867
TORONTO -- Canadian justice officials have refused a request to help American prosecutors build their case against two aboriginal men facing criminal charges in the United States stemming from an incident on Canadian soil.

Trevor Miller, 32, and Albert Douglas, 32, of Six Nations in Ontario, face allegations they assaulted three U.S. law enforcement agents visiting as official observers and stole their government-owned SUV during a confrontation in Caledonia, Ont., in the summer of 2006.

In court papers filed in New York state, Asst. U.S. Attorney William J. Hochul, Jr., said Canada "declined" a request under the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty for access "to physical evidence, forensic analysis, and witnesses in that country's possession."

Calls and e-mails to the Department of Justice in Ottawa were not returned.

The documents were filed in December in response to a motion by Miller's lawyer who is seeking to have the case dismissed citing "double jeopardy" and jurisdictional issues.

Assistant Federal Defender John Humann argues Miller has already been prosecuted, convicted and sentenced in Canada for the "exact same charges" for which he has been indicted in the U.S.

Moreover, he asserts the U.S. law enforcement officials were not acting in an official capacity and had "no business" being in Canada.

Miller pleaded guilty in Ontario in May 2007 to theft and assault charges in connection with the incident. He spent more than six months in jail before being sentenced to time served, but was arrested by U.S. authorities last April while crossing the border into Minnesota.

If convicted in the U.S. the men could face a maximum penalty of 25 years in prison for each assault count, 10 years for theft and a fine of $250,000, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

In court papers, the U.S. government said "double jeopardy" only prohibits successive prosecutions by the same sovereign and "does not bar federal prosecution following proceedings in foreign courts."

In addition, elements of the U.S. prosecution differ from the Canadian prosecution, the government said, noting the charges involve assault of a government employee working in their official capacity.

According to a criminal complaint, two U.S. border patrol agents and a special agent from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives were being escorted on a "tour" by an Ontario Provincial Police detective for the "purposes of observing" the Six Nations reserve in June 2006.

When they attempted to drive out of a cul-de-sac near the reserve they were confronted by a group of 15 protesters including Miller who was allegedly carrying a sheathed knife and demanded the officers get out of their vehicle, according to the complaint.

The OPP detective instructed the American law enforcement agents to comply with the demands, the documents said.

Miller allegedly advanced toward one of the officers "and began to pull the knife out of the sheath" before one of the agents karate chopped him on the collarbone and neck, court documents said.

At the same time, Douglas got into the driver's seat and tried to drive off, injuring the OPP officer who fell from the vehicle to the pavement, the prosecution maintains.

The SUV was recovered from the Six Nations reserve several hours later but was deemed unsafe to return to patrol duties, according to the complaint.

A judge in Buffalo will hear oral arguments Jan. 16 on the defence motion to dismiss the charges.

1) The OPP had an agreement that there would be no surveillance at the boundaries of the site, especially at the front gates.

2) The ATF surveillance vehicle and US Border Patrol officers WERE DOING SURVEILLANCE FOR THEIR OWN PURPOSES at the gate, in violation of the agreement. When they were chased away from there, they went to another border ('O-Town') and tried to continue surveillance there, again in violation of the agreement. They were again prevented from doing so.

3) Trevor threatened the officers, but the US officers attacked him violently. This is not in keeping with Canadian police protocols in place at that time. The US ATF are accustomed to repressing Indigenous protests with violence. In Canada Indigenous Peoples have legal rights under the Constitution, so the police are more circumspect.

4) I think we should charge the US Border Services and ATF with invading Canada. They were not here to assist, but to cause trouble.

The "F" Word
When is @#$% Acceptable?

There are only eleven times in history where the "F" word has

been considered acceptable for use.
They are as follows:
11. "What the @#$% do you mean,
we are sinking?"

-- Capt. E.J. Smith of RMS Titanic, 1912

10. "What the @#$% was that?"

-- Mayor Of Hiroshima , 1945

9. "Where did all those @#$%ing Indians come from?"

-- Custer, 1877

8. "Any @#$%ing idiot could understand that."

-- Einstein, 1938

7. "It does so @#$%ing look like her!"

-- Picasso, 1926

6. "How the @#$% did you work that out?"

-- Pythagoras, 126 BC

5. "You want WHAT on the @#$%ing ceiling?"

-- Michelangelo, 1566

4. "Where the @#$% are we?"

-- Amelia Earhart, 1937

3. "Scattered @#$%ing showers, my ass!"

-- Noah, 4314 BC

2. "Aw c'mon. Who the @#$% is going to find out?"

-- Bill Clinton, 1998

and a drum roll please............!

1. "Geez, I didn't think they'd get this @%#*^ing mad."

Stephen Harper, December 2008

Thursday, January 01, 2009

Margaret Wente blinks!
The most contentious column of the year contained the word "savages." It tried a defence of Olympics executive Dick Pound, who was denounced for an offhand comment he'd made (in French) that Canada had once been a land of " sauvages." I tried to argue that European culture of the 1600s had in some ways been more "advanced" than North American aboriginal cultures of the same time.

This was not a popular view, to say the least, nor did I argue it especially well, although it might not have made a difference if I had. Within hours, a Facebook group called Fire Margaret Wente had signed up thousands of new members. Their e-mails to the editor denounced me for ignorance, malice and racism, and didn't stop for weeks. Later, at a symposium on journalism ethics, I feebly explained I hadn't anticipated such a heated reaction. To which one seasoned professor replied: "Well, you should have." She was right.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081229.wcowent30/BNStory/specialComment/home

Looking Back, Looking Forward: The Political Consequences of Uncovering Genocide in Canada

By Kevin D. Annett (Eagle Strong Voice)

Squamish Nation territory

2008 was the year the impossible happened in Canada .

Our national network known as The Friends and Relatives of the Disappeared made history this past year, and forever changed the political landscape of Canada. In the words of Dora, an elderly survivor of the Kamloops Indian Residential School,

You’ve finally put our people on the map. They can’t ignore us, ever again.”

In a nutshell, we have forced Canada to admit to its genocide of native people, issue a formal apology for the residential school crimes, and acknowledge that thousands of children died in these schools. Our allied hereditary chiefs proclaimed sovereignty over indigenous land and issued eviction orders against the churches responsible for genocide.

Quite simply, after years of effort, we have forever changed the image of Canada in the world and ended an official regime of Holocaust Denial.

It has been a joy and an honor for me to help win such a moral victory for people who have never been “on the map”. But what has this victory meant for such people?

On Palm Sunday, March 16, 2008, fifty of us - natives and "whites" - walked quietly to the front of the Holy Rosary Catholic Cathedral in downtown Vancouver and stood there, facing the congregation, holding a banner that read, “All the Children Need a Proper Burial.”

We had been warned to stay away from that church. But I remember walking unafraid to the front of the sanctuary with all our people, led by three clan mothers. Among us were William Combes, Rick Lavallee and Bingo, homeless survivors of hideous tortures at Catholic residential schools.

That moment was a pinnacle for me, and for the survivors, for in the very heart of that which had tried to kill them, they were able to face it and say, We are still here, and we want our friends returned to us.

Past the angry threats of the priests, and the police who later descended on us, we were reaching out and touching the hearts of people in the Catholic church that day.

And it worked. For, after a few minutes, as our procession left the sanctuary led by the drumming of the clan mothers, the entire congregation rose spontaneously as we walked by.

It was then that I knew we had won. And sure enough, the walls began coming down after our moral victory that day.

In the wake of our March action, the missing residential school children have, for the first time, preoccupied the conscience and public discourse of Canada . It is as if the entire dominant culture is now standing, as did the Catholic parishioners, to acknowledge what they know is true, in remembrance of the missing children.

In opposition, both church and state have done their best, since that day, to belittle our work and downplay the reality of murders in Indian residential schools, and their responsibility for them. But such is always the behavior of those with their backs to the wall.

If our simple act of speaking of the dead and holding up the survivors has begun to shake loose centuries of Holocaust Denial in Canada , it has also caused us to ask ourselves, Where do we go from here?

We are no longer asking for anything from the churches and state that are responsible for genocide. Rather, all our actions in 2008 have laid the groundwork for an even greater step: drawing the broader political consequences of our exposure of Canada as a colonial and genocidal settler state, and creating an altogether new society.

Who are We and What Can We Become?

Our exposure of the Canadian genocide has simultaneously indicted the social order that gave rise to it. Euro-Canadian Christian society as a whole stands condemned in the dock alongside those persons who ran the residential schools, sterilized and murdered children, spread smallpox, and dug the mass graves.

Despite their best efforts to ignore this fact and contain the whole matter with pseudo “apologies”, the Canadian government and its partner Catholic, Anglican and United churches now face the same kind of historical reckoning that Nazi Germany did after its defeat in 1945: an awakening to their own criminal nature.

On April 20, 2007, Canada and those churches suffered a fundamental moral defeat in Parliament, when the first cabinet minister in Canadian history publicly acknowledged that untold thousands of children had died in Christian Indian residential schools.

The extent of this defeat has yet to be appreciated by most Canadians, or even indigenous people. But its impact is nevertheless reverberating throughout every level of society and undermining the very basis of Canada ’s existence.

The question now is how to draw the larger conclusions of this defeat in order to reinvent Canada from the top down, and the bottom up, with a basic purpose: the establishment of a decolonized, secular, and genuinely democratic federation of sovereign nations – the Republic of Kanata .

Shedding the Past, Creating a Future

Canada has never been allowed to become a sovereign and democratic nation because of its historical role as a resource base and captured market for first the British and then the American empire. That dependency required that Canada remain frozen as a colonial, church-dominated, semi-feudal society: a condition that has caused the sustained genocide of indigenous peoples and the destruction of their lands, and now threatens the lives of all of us.

The two attempted democratic revolutions in our history – the abortive rebellions in 1837 in Upper and Lower Canada, and the Metis Insurrection of 1885 in the Red River basin – had as their aim the ending of an Imperial oligarchy and the creation of a democratic Republic in which aboriginals and Europeans could co-exist equally. The crushing of both rebellions ensured that oligarchy and apartheid would remain the political norm in Canada .

And yet, the same vision of freedom that propelled these revolts had been originally offered by the eastern Six Nations to the arriving Europeans through the “Two Road Wampum” Great Law of Peace, in which both cultures would share the land and not seek to dominate or conquer the other.

That offer was rejected not by Europeans as a whole, but by the religious and commercial elites who ran the foreign policy of both the French and British Empires, especially during the European Religious Wars of the formative 17th century.

Time and again, the Catholic and Protestant churches subverted peaceful relations between whites and natives, and among aboriginal nations such as the Huron and Iroquois, as part of their plan to exterminate all non-Christian peoples and take their land. In the words of the Jesuit missionary Jean Brebeuf,

“There can be no peace or parity between the savages and Christians. This is required by our Faith and the fur trade.”

Canada as we know it has arisen on the basis of this basic philosophy of Christian Superior Dominion.

There is still no equality between natives and non-natives in Canada because of an apartheid Indian Act that relegates “Indians” to a separate and inferior status, and holds most of them in a state of permanent sickness, landlessness and poverty on their own land. Such permanent internal colonialism is required by the foreign and domestic corporate interests that run Canada as a fuel pump and watering hole.

Quite simply, in a neo-colonial regime like Canada , where “the Crown” legally owns all the land, native people must continue to be killed off, legally and methodically, for such theft to continue. A constant aboriginal death rate twenty times the national average is the deadly proof.

This genocidal reality will never change in Canada as it is presently constituted, since the maintenance of natives, and the poor generally, as a disempowered cash cow for others to exploit is an institutionalized part of Canadian society.

The nine billion dollar Indian Affairs industry requires a sick, dependent aboriginal populace, and a compliant class of collaborating native elites to administer this sickness. For the resulting totalitarian control of native people at every level is precisely what resource-hungry corporations need to take the last remnants of oil, timber, minerals and water from what is still aboriginal land.

Such a structurally criminal regime cannot be tinkered with or reformed, resting as it does on the oppression of most of the population, whether native or non-native. The existence of Canadians as “subjects of the Crown” under the ultimate authority of one person – a Governor-General accountable only to a foreign monarch – amounts to a state of legal slavery utterly repugnant to democracy and sovereignty.

The only way to reform a colonial system is by dismantling it” said the great Irish nationalist, Bernadette Devlin. And the key to dismantling the Canadian oligarchy is to establish responsible government by severing ties with the English monarchy and creating a federated and secular Republic of sovereign indigenous nations with full public ownership of the economy, the land, and all its resources.

In short, every vestige of the system that spawned genocide in Canada needs to be abolished, if we are serious about ending its legacy and doing justice to aboriginal people and residential school survivors.

A Program for Ending Genocide

Legal genocide in Canada has rested historically on three pillars: a colonial political oligarchy under the authority of the English Crown; a powerful, unaccountable and state-protected religious oligarchy in the Roman Catholic and Anglican churches, and later, the state-created United Church ; and a foreign-controlled, dependent economy.

To dismantle the root causes of genocide in Canada, we must replace all three of these systems, through a process of active de-construction and reconstruction: undoing what caused the wrong and building an altogether new political and social regime in its place.

To commence, our general aim must be the following steps of “decolonization and de-construction” in order to lay the basis for a true democratic and secular Republic:

I. Politically: Active disaffiliation from the English Crown and the Canadian state and its courts;

II. Spiritually: Disestablishment of the Roman Catholic, Anglican and United Church of Canada ; and

III. Socially: De-corporatizing our economy and the creation of local, self-sufficient economies under public ownership.

A real Program of Justice for all victims of genocide in Canada must restore social equality, the health of the land, and democratic sovereignty of all nations within Kanata , through these and other measures:

I. Politically:

1. Abolish the Governor-General and issue a formal Declaration of Independence from the British Crown.

2. Abolish the Indian Act, the federal courts, the Senate, the RCMP and the Indian and Northern Affairs department.

3. Reconstitute Canada as a federated and secular Republic of Kanata , based on a recognition of the root title sovereignty of all indigenous nations and of the common ownership by all citizens of the economy, wealth, lands and resources of Kanata .

II. Spiritually:

1. Tax the churches: Revoke the charitable tax-exempt status of the Roman Catholic, Anglican and United Church, nationalize all church property and land, audit and assess all payments owed by these churches to the people and indigenous nations since their inception, and return all lands and effects stolen by these churches from native people.

2. Revoke the legal charters and legislation governing the Roman Catholic, Anglican and United Church of Canada, and thereby end their official, legal status.

3. End diplomatic recognition of the Vatican and expel the Papal Nuncio.

4. Separate church and state: no funding for religious schools or churches, no religious oaths or functions connected to the state, no state protection for clergy or churches (ie, revoke sections 176 and 296 of the Criminal Code of Canada).

5. Establish a public, international inquiry into crimes of these churches against native people, including in Indian residential schools, with the power to subpoena, try and jail offenders.

III. Socially

A Jubilee Campaign to restore the land and economy to the people:

1. Cancel all debts and mortgages, and return all land to its original owners.

2. Place banks, money supply and credit under public ownership and control.

3. Impose a 100% tax on all wealth gained by inheritance, interest and speculation, and the abolition of all income tax.

4. Establish a maximum wage and redistribute all surplus income to the lower paid.

5. Collect all back taxes owed by corporations and a special tax on the super wealthy and on corporate profits.

6. Abolish foreign ownership of the economy.

7. Abolish all land speculation and the commercial trading in land.

8. Nationalize all resources.

9. Socialize all housing, medicine, education and transportation, freely available to all.

A Gaia Campaign to restore the health and harmony of the land:

1. Impose a Green Tax on all privately owned vehicles.

2. Abolish nuclear power and the uranium industry.

3. Develop wind, solar and tidal energy industries.

4. Phase out petrol vehicles, and replace with non-polluting, mass-transit systems.

5. Immediately nationalize all polluting industries and abolish or eco-convert them.

6. Legally limit the size of all land ownership to 100 hectares.

7. Collectivize all farming and agriculture, and abolish all pesticides and herbicides.

8. Abolish the sale and commercialization of water: Provide free, universal access to water through the establishment of public ownership over all water resources.

Acting on this Vision and Program

These proposals are but a beginning in a long process of social and spiritual emancipation from corporate genocide.

Our purpose as a de-colonizing movement is to create a new society within the shell of the old: to bring about a parallel social order in opposition to “Canada” through a massive democratic movement from below. We can only succeed through a conscious, activated citizenry who take control of their lives and the land.

Consequently, we reject any reliance on or involvement in the existing parliamentary or electoral system, which is based on an undemocratic allegiance to a foreign monarch.

Instead, we will seek to create new popular assemblies and courts through which the people can express their will freely and openly, justice can be directly enacted, and the present political system can be overturned. We will use mass civil disobedience, strikes, withholding of taxes, and other direct actions to undermine and replace Canada and its institutions with a truly democratic republic.

To coordinate and lead this campaign, we look to a mass revolutionary party to engender but not dominate our movement. The creation of a democratic and secular Republic of Kanata will unleash the greatest freedom and diversity among the people, who will learn through their own struggles the meaning of self-government.

Our underlying recognition is that true democracy and sovereignty cannot come into being or survive without the complete public ownership of all of Kanata by all the people. The poorest person has as equal a right to the land and its wealth as the richest, and we shall work to create a society where all class distinctions and the private ownership of the economy have been abolished.

We encourage you to share this Program and Vision, and begin to act on it.

As a first step, we call upon all people who are in agreement with this Vision and Program to take the Pledge of Allegiance to Kanata (below) and to form organizing committees in their communities to prepare for the formal launching of the Republican Party of Kanata.

In solidarity and hope for our common future,

The Elders and National Council of the Republican Movement of Kanata, in alliance with traditional Squamish Chief Siem Kiapilano

………………………………………………………………………………