Shelley Brant: Why Julian Fantino Must Go! It’’s far from an issue about threats and wire-tapped conversations, it’s about the precedent he has now set for the state of Policing in Ontario. 1) A wiretap was issued for not just Mr. Brant’s cell phone but 4 other phones including his brother who is a lawyer, although allowed under the criminal code only in extreme circumstances without judicial authority (meaning by a Judge or Justice of the Peace) this wiretap although stated to be an emergency wiretap by Julian Fantino, which would require authorization by a Judge or Justice was done under section 184.4 which is a wiretap without judicial authorization. This means if the police say it is an extreme circumstance…they will just go and wiretap whatever they like and it could be your phone next. The irony is that it takes reasonable and probable grounds to get a wiretap and nobody in the judicial system will authorize a wire-tap without those grounds and some proof that those grounds exist. There has been a dangerous precedent set here because extreme cases are meant to be cases such as a acts of hostage taking and kidnapping which involving imminent death etc. This also brings into question of break and enter, because the only one who can authorize entry into a dwelling legally for installation of these devices is a judge or justice and does so under certain conditions which is no longer than 60 days after which time an extension has to be applied for before the court. Apparently justice and the law is not to be relied on anymore, and neither are procedures or police protocol or anything of the likes. more... http://censored-news.blogspot.com/2008/07/shelley-brant-why-julian-fantino-must.html